Canningdale and Canningdale
Case
•
[2010] FamCA 285
•20 April 2010
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Canningdale and Canningdale [2010] FamCA 285
[2010] FamCA 285
20 April 2010
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of Canningdale and Canningdale, Justice Ryan of the Family Court of Australia considered orders relating to the parental responsibility and time spent with the child S. The proceedings involved the applicant, Ms Canningdale, and the respondent, Mr Canningdale, concerning arrangements for their child.
The court was required to determine the specific orders regarding parental responsibility and the schedule for Mr Canningdale to spend time with the child. This included defining the frequency, duration, and timing of contact, particularly around school holidays, birthdays, and specific weekends such as Father's Day and Mother's Day. The court also needed to address practical arrangements for the transfer of the child between parents, communication methods, and the exchange of important information regarding the child's welfare and education.
Justice Ryan's reasoning led to the discharge of all prior orders and the establishment of new arrangements. The court ordered that Ms Canningdale would have sole parental responsibility for the child. A detailed schedule was set out for Mr Canningdale's time with the child, which evolved over different periods, including specific provisions for school terms, school holidays, and significant dates. The court also mandated the use of a specific contact centre for changeovers, outlined communication protocols via telephone, and established requirements for parties to inform each other of changes in residential addresses, contact details, and significant information concerning the child's schooling and health. The court noted that the father would be provided with school reports and other relevant information.
The court was required to determine the specific orders regarding parental responsibility and the schedule for Mr Canningdale to spend time with the child. This included defining the frequency, duration, and timing of contact, particularly around school holidays, birthdays, and specific weekends such as Father's Day and Mother's Day. The court also needed to address practical arrangements for the transfer of the child between parents, communication methods, and the exchange of important information regarding the child's welfare and education.
Justice Ryan's reasoning led to the discharge of all prior orders and the establishment of new arrangements. The court ordered that Ms Canningdale would have sole parental responsibility for the child. A detailed schedule was set out for Mr Canningdale's time with the child, which evolved over different periods, including specific provisions for school terms, school holidays, and significant dates. The court also mandated the use of a specific contact centre for changeovers, outlined communication protocols via telephone, and established requirements for parties to inform each other of changes in residential addresses, contact details, and significant information concerning the child's schooling and health. The court noted that the father would be provided with school reports and other relevant information.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Remedies
-
Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0