Cando Management and Maintenance Pty Ltd v Cumberland Council
Case
•
[2019] NSWCA 26
•25 February 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Cando Management and Maintenance Pty Ltd v Cumberland Council [2019] NSWCA 26
[2019] NSWCA 26
25 February 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Cando Management and Maintenance Pty Ltd (the applicant) sought judicial review of a decision by Cumberland Council (the respondent) to declare that a development consent had lapsed. The applicant argued that work undertaken on the land had prevented the consent from lapsing. The matter came before the Court of Appeal of New South Wales.
The central legal issues before the Court of Appeal were whether the work undertaken by the applicant, specifically the clearing of trees and shrubs, constituted "the carrying out of the work" or "the use of the land" for the purposes of preventing the lapse of a development consent under section 4.53 of the *Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979* (NSW). The Court also considered whether such work was related to the building or work to which the consent applied, and whether it was in compliance with or not prohibited by the consent.
The Court of Appeal found that the clearing of trees and shrubs, in the absence of any evidence that it was done in connection with the approved development or was otherwise permitted by the consent, did not constitute "the carrying out of the work" or "the use of the land" in a manner that would prevent the lapse of the development consent. The Court emphasised that the onus was on the applicant to demonstrate that the work undertaken met the criteria for preventing lapse, and that the work must be demonstrably linked to the development authorised by the consent. The Court held that the clearing of vegetation, without more, was not sufficient to prevent the lapse of the consent.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal and affirmed the decision of the primary judge.
The central legal issues before the Court of Appeal were whether the work undertaken by the applicant, specifically the clearing of trees and shrubs, constituted "the carrying out of the work" or "the use of the land" for the purposes of preventing the lapse of a development consent under section 4.53 of the *Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979* (NSW). The Court also considered whether such work was related to the building or work to which the consent applied, and whether it was in compliance with or not prohibited by the consent.
The Court of Appeal found that the clearing of trees and shrubs, in the absence of any evidence that it was done in connection with the approved development or was otherwise permitted by the consent, did not constitute "the carrying out of the work" or "the use of the land" in a manner that would prevent the lapse of the development consent. The Court emphasised that the onus was on the applicant to demonstrate that the work undertaken met the criteria for preventing lapse, and that the work must be demonstrably linked to the development authorised by the consent. The Court held that the clearing of vegetation, without more, was not sufficient to prevent the lapse of the consent.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal and affirmed the decision of the primary judge.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Statutory Interpretation
Legal Concepts
-
Consent
-
Jurisdiction
-
Judicial Review
-
Statutory Construction
-
Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Waverley Council v Ash Samadi [2020] NSWLEC 67
Cases Citing This Decision
22
OA v Secretary, Department of Communities and Justice
[2019] NSWCA 322
Huang v Waterhouse
[2025] NSWLEC 71
Huang v Waterhouse
[2025] NSWLEC 71
Cases Cited
23
Statutory Material Cited
8
Richard v Shoalhaven City Council
[2002] NSWLEC 11
Drummoyne Municipal Council v Lebnan
[1974] HCA 34
Vines v Djordjevitch
[1955] HCA 19