Cameron and Starling (No. 2)

In the matter of *Cameron and Starling (No. 2)*, Justice Cronin of the Supreme Court of Victoria considered an application by the applicant, Mr Cameron, seeking to restrain Ms Starling from dealing with a specific sum of money held by Hocking Stuart (BSM) Pty Ltd. The dispute concerned the preservation of funds pending further proceedings.

The primary legal issue before the Court was whether an interlocutory injunction should be granted to prevent Ms Starling from transferring, disposing of, or divesting herself of $25,866.52 held by the real estate agent, Hocking Stuart (BSM) Pty Ltd, and to restrain her from directing the payout of these funds.

Justice Cronin granted the injunction, restraining Ms Starling from dealing with the specified sum of money held by Hocking Stuart (BSM) Pty Ltd. The Court also requested Hocking Stuart (BSM) Pty Ltd to note and agree to be bound by these orders. The applicant's application filed on 26 June 2008 was otherwise dismissed and removed from the list of cases awaiting a hearing.