Calvo v Ellimark Pty Ltd (No 2)
Case
•
[2016] NSWCA 197
•11 August 2016
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Calvo v Ellimark Pty Ltd (No 2) [2016] NSWCA 197
[2016] NSWCA 197
11 August 2016
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The parties to this proceeding were Calvo (the appellant) and Ellimark Pty Ltd (the respondent). The dispute concerned the appropriate orders for costs at first instance and on appeal, following a partial success for the appellant on appeal. The matter was heard in the Court of Appeal of New South Wales.
The primary legal issue before the Court of Appeal was whether the general rule that costs follow the event should apply to the costs of the appeal and the costs of the first instance proceedings, or whether a fractional costs order was more appropriate given the appellant's partial success.
The Court of Appeal determined that a fractional costs order was warranted. Their Honours reasoned that the appellant had achieved a significant but not complete victory on appeal, and that the respondent had also achieved some success. Applying the principle that costs should generally follow the event, but allowing for departures where justice requires, the Court considered it appropriate to apportion the costs to reflect the degree of success each party had achieved.
The Court ordered that the respondent pay the appellant's costs of the appeal, but that such costs be reduced by 20%. The Court further ordered that the costs of the first instance proceedings be determined by the first instance judge, with liberty to the parties to make submissions on the matter.
The primary legal issue before the Court of Appeal was whether the general rule that costs follow the event should apply to the costs of the appeal and the costs of the first instance proceedings, or whether a fractional costs order was more appropriate given the appellant's partial success.
The Court of Appeal determined that a fractional costs order was warranted. Their Honours reasoned that the appellant had achieved a significant but not complete victory on appeal, and that the respondent had also achieved some success. Applying the principle that costs should generally follow the event, but allowing for departures where justice requires, the Court considered it appropriate to apportion the costs to reflect the degree of success each party had achieved.
The Court ordered that the respondent pay the appellant's costs of the appeal, but that such costs be reduced by 20%. The Court further ordered that the costs of the first instance proceedings be determined by the first instance judge, with liberty to the parties to make submissions on the matter.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Rahme v Benjamin & Khoury Pty Ltd (Costs) [2023] NSWSC 521
Cases Citing This Decision
6
Cassaniti v Katavic (No 3)
[2023] NSWCA 247
Kumaran v Employsure Pty Ltd (No 2)
[2022] NSWCA 247
Cases Cited
3
Statutory Material Cited
2
Calvo v Ellimark Pty Ltd
[2016] NSWCA 136
Commonwealth of Australia v Gretton
[2008] NSWCA 117
Ellimark Pty Ltd v Calvo
[2015] NSWSC 1240