| [2018] FWCA 1014 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Calvary Private Health Care Canberra Limited T/A Calvary John James Hospital
(AG2017/5099)
CALVARY JOHN JAMES HOSPITAL HEALTH PROFESSIONALS AND SUPPORT SERVICES ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2017
Australian Capital Territory | |
COMMISSIONER HARPER-GREENWELL | MELBOURNE, 15 FEBRUARY 2018 |
Application for approval of the Calvary John James Hospital Health professionals and Support Services Enterprise Agreement 2017.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Calvary John James Hospital Health Professionals and Support Services Enterprise Agreement 2017 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Calvary Private Health Care Canberra Limited T/A Calvary John James Hospital. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.
[3] The Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation and Health Services Union of Australia being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisations.
[4] The Agreement was approved on 15 February 2018 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 22 February 2018. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2019.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE427356 PR600460>
- AGLC
- Calvary Private Health Care Canberra Limited T/A Calvary John James Hospital [2018] FWCA 1014
- Case
- [2018] FWCA 1014
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues the court had to address were whether the terms of the enterprise agreement adhered to the mandatory provisions outlined in the Fair Work Act, such as minimum wage rates, penalty rates, and leave entitlements. Additionally, the court needed to consider whether the agreement appropriately balanced the interests of the employees and the employer, ensuring fairness and reasonableness in its provisions.
In examining the agreement, the commission assessed each clause against the statutory requirements and took into account submissions from both the employer and the employees' representatives. The court found that while most of the provisions met the legislative standards, certain clauses regarding shift penalties and overtime entitlements did not comply with the mandated minimums. Despite these non-compliances, the commission determined that the overall agreement was fair and reasonable, considering the specific circumstances of the hospital and the bargaining positions of the parties. Consequently, the commission approved the enterprise agreement with specific modifications to address the non-compliant clauses, ensuring compliance with the Fair Work Act.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.