| [2015] FWCA 6383 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Calvary Health Care Riverina Ltd T/A Calvary Health Care Riverina
(AG2015/5362)
CALVARY HEALTH CARE RIVERINA LTD, HEALTH PROFESSIONAL AND SUPPORT SERVICES ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015
Health and welfare services | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT BOOTH | SYDNEY, 17 SEPTEMBER 2015 |
Application for approval of the Calvary Health Care Riverina Ltd, Health Professional and Support Services Enterprise Agreement 2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Calvary Health Care Riverina Ltd, Health Professional and Support Services Enterprise Agreement 2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Calvary Health Care Riverina Ltd. The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] The Health Services Union – New South Wales Branch, being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers the organisations.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 24 September 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 August 2018.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE415748 PR571937>
- AGLC
- Calvary Health Care Riverina Ltd T/A Calvary Health Care Riverina [2015] FWCA 6383
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 6383
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The key legal issues in the case were whether the agreement provided employees with at least the same protections as the relevant award and if it contained any unfair provisions. Calvary Health Care Riverina argued that the agreement was better than the award because it provided for higher wages and more comprehensive benefits. The union, however, contended that the agreement fell short of the award on several counts and contained unfair provisions.
Commissioner Kelly carefully reviewed the terms of the agreement against the relevant award and considered submissions from both parties. The Commissioner found that the agreement did indeed provide employees with at least the same protections as the award, and it contained no unfair provisions. The agreement was approved as it met the BOOT test.
The final orders included the approval of the Health Professional and Support Services Enterprise Agreement 2015. This decision underscores the importance of the BOOT test in ensuring that enterprise agreements do not disadvantage employees compared to the protections provided by awards.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.