| [2014] FWCA 6710 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Calvary Health Care Adelaide Limited
(AG2014/9004)
CALVARY HEALTH CARE ADELAIDE ALLIED HEALTH ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014
Health and welfare services | |
COMMISSIONER HAMPTON | ADELAIDE, 25 SEPTEMBER 2014 |
Application for approval of the Calvary Health Care Adelaide Allied Health Enterprise Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Calvary Health Care Adelaide Allied Health Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Calvary Health Care Adelaide Limited. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Health Services Union of Australia - SA Branch and Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union - SA and NT Branch, being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 2 October 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2016.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE410314 PR555846>
- AGLC
- Calvary Health Care Adelaide Limited [2014] FWCA 6710
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 6710
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues the Commission had to address were whether the agreement was genuinely negotiated, if it was in writing, and if it complied with the provisions of the Fair Work Act. The Commission had to examine the process of negotiation, the content of the agreement, and its adherence to the legislative standards for enterprise agreements. Specifically, the Commission needed to ensure that the agreement contained minimum terms and conditions, was free from prohibited content, and was made in good faith.
The Commission found that the agreement was genuinely negotiated between the parties in good faith and was in writing. It contained all the required minimum terms and conditions and did not include any prohibited content. The Commission was satisfied that the process of negotiation met the legislative requirements, and the agreement was fair and reasonable. Consequently, the Commission approved the agreement and ordered its registration. The decision confirmed that the agreement met all statutory requirements and was therefore valid and enforceable.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.