[2013] FWCA 7638 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.210 - Application for approval of a variation of an enterprise agreement
Calvary Health Care Adelaide
(AG2013/9403)
CALVARY HEALTH CARE ADELAIDE ALLIED HEALTH ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2012
Health and welfare services | |
COMMISSIONER HAMPTON | ADELAIDE, 8 OCTOBER 2013 |
Application for variation of the Calvary Health Care Adelaide Allied Health Enterprise Agreement 2012.
[1] An application has been made for approval of a variation to an enterprise agreement known as the Calvary Health Care Adelaide Allied Health Enterprise Agreement 2012 (the Agreement). The agreement is a single enterprise agreement. This application was made by Calvary Health Care Adelaide pursuant to s.210 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] The application was not lodged within 14 days after the variation was made. Pursuant to s.210(3)(b) of the Act I consider it fair to extend the time for making this application to 16 September 2013.
[3] The application was accompanied by declarations required by the Fair Work Australia Rules 2010 and I convened a conference of the parties on 30 September 2013.
[4] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.210 and 211 of the Act as relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[5] The variation to the Agreement is approved and a consolidated copy of the agreement, as varied, is attached to this decision. In accordance with s.216 of the Act, the variation will operate on and from the first full pay period commencing on or after 30 September 2013.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE897603 PR542730>
- AGLC
- Calvary Health Care Adelaide [2013] FWCA 7638
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 7638
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission found that the proposed changes were not in the spirit of good faith bargaining and that they did not facilitate the ongoing relationship between the parties. The changes were deemed to be unreasonable and not in the best interests of the employees. The Commission also found that the changes were not necessary to achieve a fair and efficient workplace and that they did not reflect the principles of enterprise bargaining. The application was dismissed.
The Commission emphasised the importance of genuine and good faith bargaining in the enterprise bargaining process. The Commission found that the proposed changes were not in line with the principles of enterprise bargaining and that they did not facilitate the ongoing relationship between the parties. The Commission also found that the changes were unreasonable and not in the best interests of the employees. The application for variation of the agreement was dismissed.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.