[2013] FWCA 995 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Caltex Refineries (Qld) Pty Ltd
(AG2012/14410)
CALTEX REFINERIES (QLD) PTY LTD MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2012
Oil and gas industry | |
VICE PRESIDENT WATSON | SYDNEY, 13 FEBRUARY 2013 |
Application for approval of the Caltex Refineries (Qld) Pty Ltd Mechanical Maintenance Enterprise Agreement 2012.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Caltex Refineries (Qld) Pty Ltd Mechanical Maintenance Enterprise Agreement 2012 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Caltex Refineries (Qld) Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement was approved on 13 February 2013 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 20 February 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 25 November 2015.
VICE PRESIDENT WATSON
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE899855 PR534040>
- AGLC
- Caltex Refineries (Qld) Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 995
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 995
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the commission was whether the agreement met the criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the commission had to consider whether the agreement provided fair and reasonable terms and conditions, and whether it had been made in good faith. Another significant concern was whether the agreement appropriately balanced the interests of both employees and employers.
The Fair Work Commission found that the agreement did meet the necessary criteria for approval. The commission noted that the agreement had been negotiated in good faith and that it provided fair and reasonable terms for the employees. The commission also observed that the agreement had appropriately balanced the interests of both parties. The commission concluded that the agreement did not unfairly disadvantage any party and therefore approved the agreement. The union's application was dismissed.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.