Calin v The Greater Union Organisation Pty Limited

This matter came before the High Court of Australia concerning an application for special leave to appeal by Ms. Georghita Calin against The Greater Union Organisation Pty Limited. Ms. Calin appeared in person, having had her legal representation withdrawn due to financial constraints.

The primary legal issue before the Court was whether it could entertain Ms. Calin's application for special leave to appeal when it was not presented by counsel, as required by the Rules of the High Court. The Court was also implicitly asked to consider the applicant's plea to be heard despite her inability to afford legal representation.

Mason CJ explained that the High Court's Rules of Court mandate that applications for special leave must be presented by a barrister. The Court, therefore, had no authority to hear or determine the application if it was not presented in accordance with these prescribed procedures. While acknowledging Ms. Calin's financial difficulties and her desire to be heard, the Chief Justice reiterated the binding nature of the Court's rules. The Court indicated a potential course of action, subject to the respondent's opposition, which was to grant an adjournment to allow Ms. Calin further opportunity to secure legal representation.