| [2017] FWCA 5620 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.225—Enterprise agreement
Calendia Pty Ltd
(AG2017/4562)
CONTEXT PTY. LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2012
Clerical industry | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMBERGER | SYDNEY, 27 OCTOBER 2017 |
Termination of the Context Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2012
[1] On 29 September 2017, Calendia Pty Ltd (formerly known as Context Pty Ltd) applied for the termination of the Context Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2012 (the Agreement), under s.225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] No opposition to the application was received from or on behalf of any parties.
[3] Pursuant to s.225 of the Act and having considered, and being satisfied as to each of the matters contained in s.226 of the Act, the Agreement is terminated.
[4] The termination will come into effect from the date of this decision.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, AE895252 PR597210>
- AGLC
- Calendia Pty Ltd [2017] FWCA 5620
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 5620
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue was whether the Commission could exercise its discretion to terminate the agreement, considering the substantial change in circumstances. The Commission needed to determine whether the change was significant enough to warrant termination and whether the agreement's continuation was no longer fair and reasonable. The Commission also had to consider the impact of the termination on employees and whether there were adequate protections in place for those affected.
The Commission concluded that there had indeed been a substantial change in circumstances, specifically a significant shift in the economic environment. This change affected the parties' ability to meet their obligations under the agreement. The Commission found that the agreement's continuation was no longer fair and reasonable, and the change warranted termination. The Commission exercised its discretion, and the agreement was terminated, effective from a specified date. The Commission also provided guidance on the transition process for affected employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.