Cai and Xun
Case
•
[2017] FCCA 1911
•31 July 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Cai and Xun [2017] FCCA 1911
[2017] FCCA 1911
31 July 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of *Cai and Xun*, heard before Judge Harland of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia, the dispute concerned family law proceedings. The specific nature of the dispute, beyond it being a family law matter, is not detailed in the provided text.
The court was required to determine the appropriate directions for the progression of the proceedings. This included setting a date for a final hearing, establishing deadlines for the wife to file and serve documents, and considering the reasonableness of employing an advocate.
Judge Harland ordered that the proceeding be adjourned for a final hearing on an undefended basis on 22 November 2017. The wife was directed to file and serve any documents upon which she wished to rely by 2 October 2017. Furthermore, pursuant to Rule 21.15 of the Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001, the Court certified that it was reasonable for the parties to employ an advocate. The wife was also ordered to serve and file an Affidavit of Service prior to the next court event.
The court was required to determine the appropriate directions for the progression of the proceedings. This included setting a date for a final hearing, establishing deadlines for the wife to file and serve documents, and considering the reasonableness of employing an advocate.
Judge Harland ordered that the proceeding be adjourned for a final hearing on an undefended basis on 22 November 2017. The wife was directed to file and serve any documents upon which she wished to rely by 2 October 2017. Furthermore, pursuant to Rule 21.15 of the Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001, the Court certified that it was reasonable for the parties to employ an advocate. The wife was also ordered to serve and file an Affidavit of Service prior to the next court event.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Cai and Xun [2017] FCCA 1911
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
3
Statutory Material Cited
3
Shaw & Shaw
[2016] FamCAFC 159
Mickelberg v The Queen
[1989] HCA 35
Vanderlay & Theodopolos
[2008] FamCAFC 119