Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
- Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: C & C Investment Trading Pty Ltd v Strathfield Municipal Council [2015] NSWLEC 1243 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 15 and 23 June 2015 Date of orders: 01 July 2015 Decision date: 01 July 2015 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Brown C Decision: See (5) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: Partial demolition of existing improvements and alterations and additions for a boarding house; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Land and Environment Court Act 1979Category: Principal judgment Parties: C & C Investment Trading Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Strathfield Municipal Council (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
Ms Alice Spizzo, solicitor (Applicant)
Mr Timothy O'Connor, solicitor (Respondent)
Landerer & Company (Applicant)
Houston Dearn O'Connor (Respondent)
File Number(s): 10918 of 2014 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal against the refusal of DA 2014/103 for the partial demolition of existing improvements and alterations and additions for a boarding house at 51 – 55 Homebush Road, Strathfield.
-
In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement were made on the date recorded on those orders. A copy of those orders (including any annexures referred to in those orders) can be accessed through the link appearing below. The date of the orders appears on the first page of the orders.
…………….
G T Brown
Commissioner of the Court
10918 of 2014 Brown (s34O) amended_orders (220 KB, pdf)
Amendments
21 July 2015 - Amended conditions
- AGLC
- C and C Investment Trading Pty Ltd v Strathfield Municipal Council [2015] NSWLEC 1243
- Case
- [2015] NSWLEC 1243
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered the legal issues to be whether the decision was made in accordance with the proper procedure, and whether the decision was unreasonable. The applicant argued that the decision was procedurally unfair as the council did not provide the applicant with an opportunity to make a submission prior to the council making its decision. The applicant also contended that the council failed to consider relevant matters, including the zoning of the property and the relevant planning instruments.
The court found that the decision was procedurally fair, as the applicant had an opportunity to make a submission to the council before the decision was made. The court also found that the decision was not unreasonable, as the council had properly considered the relevant planning instruments and zoning of the property. The court noted that the applicant's argument that the council failed to consider relevant matters was not supported by the evidence. The court dismissed the application for judicial review.
The court ordered that the applicant pay the respondent's costs of the proceeding on the standard basis. The court also ordered that the costs be paid within 28 days from the date of the judgment.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (5) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.