BWQ v Commissioner of Victims Rights
Case
•
[2015] NSWCATAD 197
•18 September 2015
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
BWQ v Commissioner of Victims Rights [2015] NSWCATAD 197
[2015] NSWCATAD 197
18 September 2015
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The applicant, BWQ, sought judicial review of a decision made by the Commissioner of Victims Rights in relation to a recognition payment for being a victim of domestic violence and physical assault. The case was heard in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia. The applicant argued that she was a primary victim of an act of violence which resulted in grievous bodily harm, and that she was entitled to a Category C recognition payment of $5,000 under the Victims Rights and Support Act 2013 and the accompanying regulation.
The court was required to decide whether to grant leave to the applicant to proceed with her application for judicial review, despite the late application for internal review. The court also had to determine whether the applicant was a primary victim of an act of violence resulting in grievous bodily harm and whether she was entitled to a Category C recognition payment. The Commissioner of Victims Rights argued that the application for internal review was made late and that the applicant was not entitled to a Category C recognition payment.
The court held that it had the discretion to grant leave to the applicant to proceed with her application for judicial review, despite the late application for internal review. The court found that the applicant was a primary victim of an act of violence resulting in grievous bodily harm, as she had suffered from a series of related acts of domestic violence and physical assault over a period of two years. The court also found that the applicant was entitled to a Category C recognition payment of $5,000, as she met the criteria under the Victims Rights and Support Act 2013 and the accompanying regulation.
The court granted leave to the applicant to proceed with her application for judicial review and varied the decision of the Assessor (Client Claims) to recognise the applicant as a primary victim of an act of violence resulting in grievous bodily harm. The court ordered that the applicant was entitled to a Category C recognition payment of $5,000. The Commissioner of Victims Rights was directed to pay the applicant the recognition payment within 28 days of the judgment.
The court was required to decide whether to grant leave to the applicant to proceed with her application for judicial review, despite the late application for internal review. The court also had to determine whether the applicant was a primary victim of an act of violence resulting in grievous bodily harm and whether she was entitled to a Category C recognition payment. The Commissioner of Victims Rights argued that the application for internal review was made late and that the applicant was not entitled to a Category C recognition payment.
The court held that it had the discretion to grant leave to the applicant to proceed with her application for judicial review, despite the late application for internal review. The court found that the applicant was a primary victim of an act of violence resulting in grievous bodily harm, as she had suffered from a series of related acts of domestic violence and physical assault over a period of two years. The court also found that the applicant was entitled to a Category C recognition payment of $5,000, as she met the criteria under the Victims Rights and Support Act 2013 and the accompanying regulation.
The court granted leave to the applicant to proceed with her application for judicial review and varied the decision of the Assessor (Client Claims) to recognise the applicant as a primary victim of an act of violence resulting in grievous bodily harm. The court ordered that the applicant was entitled to a Category C recognition payment of $5,000. The Commissioner of Victims Rights was directed to pay the applicant the recognition payment within 28 days of the judgment.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Victims' Rights
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Recognition Payment
-
Grievous Bodily Harm
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
GFM v Commissioner of Victims Rights [2024] NSWCATAD 156
Cases Citing This Decision
16
GFM v Commissioner of Victims Rights
[2024] NSWCATAD 156
FPJ v Commissioner of Victims Rights
[2023] NSWCATAD 95
FKW v Commissioner of Victims Rights
[2022] NSWCATAD 337
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
4