Bustos and Bustos
Case
•
[2019] FCCA 3522
•5 December 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Bustos and Bustos [2019] FCCA 3522
[2019] FCCA 3522
5 December 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of *Bustos and Bustos*, heard by Judge Riley, the applicant sought orders against the respondent. The precise nature of the dispute between the parties is not detailed in the provided text, beyond the fact that it involved family law proceedings.
The central legal issue before the court concerned the appropriate basis for awarding costs. Specifically, the court was required to determine whether costs should be awarded on a standard or indemnity basis.
Judge Riley ordered that the applicant pay the respondent’s costs of, and incidental to, the proceedings on an indemnity basis. This decision was fixed at the sum of $15,099.40. The court's reasoning for this order is not elaborated upon in the provided text.
The central legal issue before the court concerned the appropriate basis for awarding costs. Specifically, the court was required to determine whether costs should be awarded on a standard or indemnity basis.
Judge Riley ordered that the applicant pay the respondent’s costs of, and incidental to, the proceedings on an indemnity basis. This decision was fixed at the sum of $15,099.40. The court's reasoning for this order is not elaborated upon in the provided text.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Statutory Construction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Bustos and Bustos [2019] FCCA 3522
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
9
Statutory Material Cited
0
Colgate-Palmolive Co v Cussons Pty ltd
[1993] FCA 801
Oshlack v Richmond River Council
[1998] HCA 11
Ellis v Silver Vision Pty Ltd (No 2)
[2017] FCCA 151