Buse v Commissioner of Police
Case
•
[2018] QDC 90
•24 May 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Buse v Commissioner of Police [2018] QDC 90
[2018] QDC 90
24 May 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the case of Buse v Commissioner of Police, the appellant was convicted of driving a motor vehicle without a driver’s licence while the licence was suspended and driving under the influence of alcohol. The appellant was sentenced to twelve months imprisonment, suspended immediately with a five-year operational period for the second charge, and two and a half years disqualification from holding or obtaining a driver’s licence on each charge, to be served cumulatively. The appellant appealed the sentence, arguing that it was manifestly excessive and that the court did not sufficiently consider the possibility of the appellant remaining in the community. The appellant also argued that excessive weight was given to the appellant’s traffic history and that weight was erroneously given to an uncharged act.
The court considered the principles of sentencing in the context of the appellant’s offending history and the need to protect the community. The court found that the sentence was not manifestly excessive and that the appellant’s offending history and the need to protect the community were properly considered. The court also found that the sentence was proportionate to the offending and that the appellant’s offending history was relevant to the sentence. The court found that the sentence was not excessive and that the appellant’s offending history and the need to protect the community were properly considered.
The appeal was dismissed. The court found that the sentence was not manifestly excessive and that the appellant’s offending history and the need to protect the community were properly considered. The court found that the sentence was proportionate to the offending and that the appellant’s offending history was relevant to the sentence. The court found that the sentence was not excessive and that the appellant’s offending history and the need to protect the community were properly considered. The appeal was dismissed, and the original sentence was upheld.
The court considered the principles of sentencing in the context of the appellant’s offending history and the need to protect the community. The court found that the sentence was not manifestly excessive and that the appellant’s offending history and the need to protect the community were properly considered. The court also found that the sentence was proportionate to the offending and that the appellant’s offending history was relevant to the sentence. The court found that the sentence was not excessive and that the appellant’s offending history and the need to protect the community were properly considered.
The appeal was dismissed. The court found that the sentence was not manifestly excessive and that the appellant’s offending history and the need to protect the community were properly considered. The court found that the sentence was proportionate to the offending and that the appellant’s offending history was relevant to the sentence. The court found that the sentence was not excessive and that the appellant’s offending history and the need to protect the community were properly considered. The appeal was dismissed, and the original sentence was upheld.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Breach of Contract
-
Criminal Liability
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
ZZB v The Queensland Police Service [2023] QDC 60
Cases Citing This Decision
8
ZZB v The Queensland Police Service
[2023] QDC 60
Johnstone v The Commissioner of Police
[2019] QDC 109
Gordon v Macarthur
[2019] QDC 15
Cases Cited
7
Statutory Material Cited
2
Low v McMonagle
[2011] QDC 109
R v Tout
[2012] QCA 296
Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li
[2013] HCA 18