Burton v Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions
Case
•
[2019] NSWCA 245
•11 October 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Burton v Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions [2019] NSWCA 245
[2019] NSWCA 245
11 October 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Burton appealed to the Court of Appeal of New South Wales against orders made by a primary judge dismissing his proceedings against the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions. The dispute concerned whether the primary judge had erred in dismissing Burton's claim, which alleged, among other things, that the institution of criminal proceedings against him constituted a collateral abuse of process.
The Court of Appeal was required to determine whether the primary judge had correctly concluded that Burton's statement of claim failed to disclose a reasonable cause of action. Specifically, the court considered whether the tort of collateral abuse of process, as distinct from grounds justifying a stay of proceedings, had been properly pleaded and whether the institution of criminal proceedings with the intent to vex an accused fell within the lawful scope of the criminal process. The court also considered whether a non-publication order made by the primary judge was an interim order.
The Court of Appeal granted leave to appeal on all grounds except one. It reasoned that the primary judge had erred in dismissing the proceedings summarily. The court held that the tort of collateral abuse of process, which involves using the legal process for an ulterior purpose, was capable of being established on the facts pleaded. The court also found that the institution of criminal proceedings for the purpose of vexing an accused was not within the lawful scope of the criminal process.
Consequently, the Court of Appeal set aside the orders made by the primary judge dismissing Burton's proceedings.
The Court of Appeal was required to determine whether the primary judge had correctly concluded that Burton's statement of claim failed to disclose a reasonable cause of action. Specifically, the court considered whether the tort of collateral abuse of process, as distinct from grounds justifying a stay of proceedings, had been properly pleaded and whether the institution of criminal proceedings with the intent to vex an accused fell within the lawful scope of the criminal process. The court also considered whether a non-publication order made by the primary judge was an interim order.
The Court of Appeal granted leave to appeal on all grounds except one. It reasoned that the primary judge had erred in dismissing the proceedings summarily. The court held that the tort of collateral abuse of process, which involves using the legal process for an ulterior purpose, was capable of being established on the facts pleaded. The court also found that the institution of criminal proceedings for the purpose of vexing an accused was not within the lawful scope of the criminal process.
Consequently, the Court of Appeal set aside the orders made by the primary judge dismissing Burton's proceedings.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Negligence & Tort
Legal Concepts
-
Abuse of Process
-
Appeal
-
Summary Judgment
-
Jurisdiction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Burton v The King [2024] NSWCCA 213
Cases Citing This Decision
25
Burton v Babb
[2023] NSWCA 242
State of New South Wales v Spedding
[2023] NSWCA 180
Marino v Bello (No 3)
[2022] NSWCA 181
Cases Cited
38
Statutory Material Cited
4
Dowling v Colonial Mutual Life Assurance Society Ltd
[1915] HCA 56
Williams v Spautz
[1992] HCA 34
Dowling v Colonial Mutual Life Assurance Society Ltd
[1915] HCA 56