COURT OF APPEAL
de JERSEY CJ
DAVIES JA
JERRARD JA
Appeal No 6131 of 2004
ANDREW BURNS and YVONNE BURNS
T'AS ABBY'S BARGAIN CENTRE (Applicant) Appellant
and
JOHN ALEXANDER McLEOD AND
LYNETTE ANNE McLEOD (First Respondents) First Respondents
and
TESRON PTY LTD ACN 002 229 772
T'AS GOLDWELL BANKER CHATEAX REALTY
(Second Respondent) Second Respondent
BRISBANE
..DATE 13/10/2004
ORDER
THE CHIEF JUSTICE: Appeal dismissed. We take the view that the appellant should pay the costs of the respondents, to be assessed, of and incidental to the appeal and those reserved at first instance. We order accordingly.
-----
- AGLC
- Burns & Burns T/as Abby's Bargain Centre v McLeod [2004] QCA 384
- Case
- [2004] QCA 384
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The appellants argued that the District Court judge erred in not allowing them to present their defence, which was that they had an oral agreement with the respondents for the sale of a property, and that the written contract was not a true reflection of their agreement. The respondents contended that the appellants had failed to establish a valid defence and that the District Court judge was correct in entering a default judgment against them. The court considered the evidence and submissions of both parties and determined that the appellants had not established a valid defence to the claim. The court found that the appellants had failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claim of an oral agreement and that the written contract was the true agreement between the parties.
The Court of Appeal held that the appellants had not demonstrated any error on the part of the District Court judge in entering a default judgment against them. The court found that the appellants had not provided sufficient evidence to rebut the presumption that the written contract was the true agreement between the parties. The court further held that the appellants had not established any grounds for setting aside the default judgment, and therefore, the appeal was dismissed. The court ordered that the appellants pay the costs of the respondents, to be assessed, of and incidental to the appeal and those reserved at first instance.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.