DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement

Burleigh Marr Distributions Pty Ltd T/A Bidfood Toowoomba
(AG2019/676)

BIDFOOD TOOWOOMBA – ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2019

Storage services
COMMISSIONER LEE	SYDNEY, 9 AUGUST 2019

Application for approval of the Bidfood Toowoomba - Enterprise Agreement 2019.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Bidfood Toowoomba - Enterprise Agreement 2019 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Burleigh Marr Distributions Pty Ltd T/A Bidfood Toowoomba. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.

[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[4] I observe that the following provisions are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES):

• Clause 2.2.5 - Notice of Termination by an Employee

• Clause 2.3.6 - Entitlement to Redundancy

However, noting clause 1 of the undertaking provided, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 16 August 2019. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 September 2021.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

Annexure A

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Burleigh Marr Distributions Pty Ltd, trading as Bidfood Toowoomba, applied to the Fair Work Commission for the approval of the Bidfood Toowoomba - Enterprise Agreement 2019. The application was made under the Fair Work Act 2009, which mandates that an enterprise agreement be free from prohibited content and meet certain procedural requirements before it can be approved and registered. The dispute centred on whether the agreement complied with these statutory standards.

The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the enterprise agreement contained any terms that were considered prohibited content under the Fair Work Act. Prohibited content includes provisions that contravene minimum entitlements, allow for discriminatory treatment, or undermine the right of employees to organise and bargain collectively. The Commission also had to consider whether the agreement was made following a proper process, including whether it was the product of genuine bargaining and whether the requisite procedural steps were followed.

In determining that the agreement was free from prohibited content, the Commission found that it did not include any terms that contravened minimum entitlements, discriminated against any class of employees, or undermined collective bargaining rights. The Commission also found that the agreement was the product of genuine bargaining, and that all procedural requirements had been properly followed. The Commission approved the agreement, and it was registered on the relevant national registration system. The approval ensures that the terms of the agreement will govern the employment conditions of the relevant employees for the duration of the agreement.

Burleigh Marr Distributions Pty Ltd T/A Bidfood Toowoomba

DECISION

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established