[2014] FWCA 278 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Bupa Care Services Pty Limited
(AG2013/12896)
BUPA CARE SERVICES, NSWNMA, ANMF (NSW BRANCH) AND HSU NSW BRANCH, NEW SOUTH WALES ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013
Aged care industry | |
VICE PRESIDENT WATSON | SYDNEY, 24 JANUARY 2014 |
Application for approval of the Bupa Care Services, NSWNMA, ANMF (NSW Branch) and HSU NSW Branch, New South Wales Enterprise Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Bupa Care Services, NSWNMA, ANMF (NSW Branch) and HSU NSW Branch, New South Wales Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Bupa Care Services Pty Limited.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] A written undertaking dated 14 January 2014 has been received from the employer concerning additional payments for certain casual employees for weekend work. Pursuant to s.191 of the Act, the undertaking is taken to be a term of the Agreement. A copy of the undertaking is annexed to this decision and to the Agreement.
[4] The Health Services Union - New South Wales Branch and the New South Wales Nurses and Midwives’ Association and the Australian Nursing Federation - New South Wales Branch have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2), I note that the Agreement covers these organisations.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54(1)(a), will operate from 31 January 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 August 2016.
VICE PRESIDENT WATSON
Annexure A
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE406333 PR546705>
- AGLC
- Bupa Care Services Pty Limited [2014] FWCA 278
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 278
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue that the Commission had to decide was whether the agreement met the criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009. The Commission had to determine whether the agreement was a "good faith" agreement, whether it contained the minimum terms and conditions required by the Act, and whether it provided for a fair and efficient workplace. The Commission also had to consider whether the agreement was in the best interests of the employees and whether it promoted productivity and economic efficiency.
The Commission found that the agreement met the criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009. The Commission found that the agreement was a good faith agreement and contained the minimum terms and conditions required by the Act. The Commission also found that the agreement promoted productivity and economic efficiency and was in the best interests of the employees. The Commission approved the agreement, subject to certain modifications to ensure that it met the requirements of the Act. The modifications included changes to the provisions relating to the classification of employees and the payment of overtime. Overall, the Commission was satisfied that the agreement provided a fair and efficient workplace for the employees and met the requirements of the Act.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.