[2013] FWCA 7084 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Bunzl Outsourcing Services Pty Ltd
(AG2013/2800)
BUNZL SCORESBY DISTRIBUTION CENTRE AND NATIONAL UNION OF WORKERS (NUW) VIC ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013
Storage services | |
COMMISSIONER ROE | MELBOURNE, 17 SEPTEMBER 2013 |
Application for approval of the Bunzl Scoresby Distribution Centre and National Union of Workers (NUW) VIC Enterprise Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Bunzl Scoresby Distribution Centre and National Union of Workers (NUW) VIC Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Bunzl Outsourcing Services Pty Ltd (the Applicant). The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer however taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.
[3] The National Union of Workers has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 24 September 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 July 2016.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE404113 PR541919>
- AGLC
- Bunzl Outsourcing Services Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 7084
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 7084
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues the court had to address included whether the agreement was made in good faith, whether it contained the required minimum terms and conditions as stipulated by the Act, and whether it complied with the procedural requirements for enterprise agreements. Specifically, the court needed to determine if the necessary consultations were conducted and if the agreement was fairly and genuinely negotiated between the parties.
In its reasoning, the commission found that the agreement was indeed made in good faith and contained all the necessary minimum terms and conditions. The procedural aspects were also in order, with adequate consultations having been undertaken. The commission highlighted that the agreement provided a fair balance of rights and obligations between the parties and was consistent with the principles of the Act. The outcome was that the commission approved the enterprise agreement, confirming its compliance with the statutory requirements and its appropriateness for the workforce at the Bunzl Scoresby Distribution Centre.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.