[2013] FWCA 6243 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Bunnings Group Limited
(AG2013/2454)
BUNNINGS AND CFMEU FRAME AND TRUSS WARNERVALE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013
Timber and paper products industry | |
COMMISSIONER BLAIR | MELBOURNE, 29 AUGUST 2013 |
Application for approval of the Bunnings and CFMEU Frame and Truss Warnervale Enterprise Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of a single-enterprise agreement known as the Bunnings and CFMEU Frame and Truss Warnervale Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Bunnings Group Limited.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.
[3] The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union, being the bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 5 September 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2017.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE403508 PR540880>
- AGLC
- Bunnings Group Limited [2013] FWCA 6243
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 6243
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court had to determine whether the provisions of the agreement were consistent with the applicable industrial laws and whether they were fairly negotiated between the parties. Issues such as the classification of employees, the application of award rates, and the procedural fairness in the negotiation process were examined. The court considered whether the agreement complied with the requirements set out in the Fair Work Act 2009, including the necessity for good faith bargaining and the avoidance of unjustifiable hardship.
The court found that the enterprise agreement was largely consistent with the relevant industrial laws. It concluded that the provisions were fairly negotiated and did not result in unjustifiable hardship. The court highlighted that the agreement provided for adequate protections for employees and that the negotiation process was conducted in good faith. Consequently, the court approved the enterprise agreement. The final orders confirmed the approval and mandated that the agreement be registered with the Fair Work Commission.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.