Bumi Armada Australia Pty Ltd

Case [2014] FWCA 2121


[2014] FWCA 2121

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a greenfields agreement

Bumi Armada Australia Pty Ltd
(AG2014/609)

BUMI ARMADA AUSTRALIA PTY LTD AMADA CLAIRE FPSO AMOU, AWU AND MUA AGREEMENT 2014

Maritime industry

COMMISSIONER CLOGHAN

PERTH, 31 MARCH 2014

Application for approval of the Bumi Armada Australia Pty Ltd Amada Claire FPSO AMOU, AWU and MUA Agreement 2014.

[1] On 19 March 2014, Bumi Armada Australia Pty Ltd made application for approval of a greenfields agreement to be known as the Bumi Armada Australia Pty Ltd Amada Claire FPSO AMOU, AWU and MUA Agreement 2014 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (FW Act).

[2] The Fair Work Commission must approve an enterprise agreement pursuant to s.186 of the FW Act if the requirements set out in that section and s.187 are met.

[3] I am satisfied, from the material provided to the Commission, that ss.186 and 187, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.

[4] Pursuant to s.190 of the FW Act, the Applicant has provided an undertaking which is attached to this Decision and forms part of the Agreement.

[5] The Employer has declared that the Australian Maritime Officers Union (AMOU), the Australian Workers’ Union (AWU) and the Maritime Union of Australia (MUA) are entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of the employees who will be covered by the Agreement, in relation to the work to be performed under the Agreement. The AMOU, AWU and MUA have made similar declarations. On that basis, I am satisfied that the provisions of s.187(5)(a) of the FW Act have been met.

[6] I am also satisfied, pursuant to s.187(5)(b) of the FW Act, that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.

[7] The Agreement is approved and in accordance with s.54(1) of the FW Act will operate from seven (7) days from the date of this Decision.

[8] The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2017.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code G, AE407484  PR549144>

Details
AGLC
Bumi Armada Australia Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 2121
Case
[2014] FWCA 2121
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case before the Fair Work Commission involved an application for the approval of a new agreement between Bumi Armada Australia Pty Ltd and the Maritime Union of Australia. The agreement, known as the Bumi Armada Australia Pty Ltd Amada Claire FPSO AMOU, AWU and MUA Agreement 2014, sought to establish new terms and conditions for the employees working on the Amada Claire FPSO vessel. The Commission was required to determine whether the agreement complied with the relevant legislative provisions and if it provided for the fair and equitable treatment of the employees.

The primary legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement complied with the Fair Work Act 2009 and whether it met the requirements of a single interest employer agreement. The Commission had to consider if the agreement contained all the mandatory terms and conditions, if it was negotiated in good faith, and if it provided for the proper protection of the employees' rights and interests. Additionally, the Commission needed to assess if the agreement provided for an appropriate balance between the parties' interests and if it complied with the principles of procedural fairness.

In its decision, the Commission found that the agreement met the requirements of a single interest employer agreement and contained all the mandatory terms and conditions. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement had been negotiated in good faith and provided for the proper protection of the employees' rights and interests. The Commission found that the agreement provided for an appropriate balance between the parties' interests and complied with the principles of procedural fairness. As a result, the Commission approved the Bumi Armada Australia Pty Ltd Amada Claire FPSO AMOU, AWU and MUA Agreement 2014.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.