BULLER & MARTIN

The parties involved were Buller and Martin. The dispute concerned an application for a stay of an order previously made by Hogan J on 18 March 2016. The application for the stay was heard by Hogan J.

The legal issue before the court was whether the operation of the order made on 18 March 2016 should be stayed pending further proceedings.

Hogan J dismissed the application for a stay. The reasons for this dismissal are not detailed in the provided text, but the outcome indicates that the applicant failed to satisfy the court that a stay was warranted. The court reserved the costs of and incidental to the application for a stay to the trial Judge.