Buildcorp Contracting NSW Pty Ltd v Build Corp Construction Pty Ltd

Case [2019] FCA 90


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Buildcorp Contracting NSW Pty Ltd v Build Corp Construction Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 90

File number: NSD 2026 of 2018
Judge: ROBERTSON J
Date of judgment: 7 February 2019
Legislation: Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) s 126
Date of hearing: 7 February 2019
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Sub-area: Trade Marks
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 14
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr D Green of Green & Associates, agent for HW Litigation
Counsel for the Respondents: The Respondents did not appear

ORDERS

NSD 2026 of 2018
BETWEEN:

BUILDCORP CONTRACTING NSW PTY LTD ACN003 922 825

Applicant

AND:

BUILD CORP CONSTRUCTION PTY LTD ACN 615 640 705

First Respondent

YASSAR BAKIR
Second Respondent

JUDGE:

ROBERTSON J

DATE OF ORDER:

7 February 2019

BY CONSENT, THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.The first and second respondents:

(a)be restrained from infringing the Buildcorp Marks (as defined in paragraph 5 of the Statement of Claim, a copy of which is annexed to these orders), including that they:

(i)immediately and permanently cease and desist from all unauthorised use of the Buildcorp Marks, or any substantially identical or deceptively similar trade mark;

(ii)not, in future:

1reproduce, publish or otherwise use the Buildcorp Marks;

2apply to register or use any company or business name which incorporates the Buildcorp Marks, or any substantially identical or deceptively similar name, or any name which suggests a connection with, or endorsement by, the applicant;

3pass off any business or services as having any association with, or endorsement or authorisation by the applicant; and

4falsely represent in trade or commerce that any business or services provided by either of them have any connection, affiliation or association with the applicant; and

(iii)change the first respondent’s name so that it no longer infringes on the applicant’s intellectual property rights;

(b)within 7 days of this order:

(i)lodge necessary documents with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission to record a change or cancel the company name of the first respondent so that it no longer infringes the Buildcorp Marks;

(ii)remove the Yellow Pages advertisement (as referred to in paragraph 8b of the Statement of Claim);

(iii)destroy all inventory (including, but not limited to, clothing, vehicles, signage, business cards) that contains any reference or association with the Buildcorp Marks; and

(iv)in the alternative to 1(b)(iii) herein, otherwise take steps to alter the inventory so as to remove any reference to the Buildcorp Marks; and

(c)within 30 days of this order, file with this Honourable Court an affidavit or statutory declaration confirming that the orders contained in paragraph 1(a) and (b) herein have been complied with and serve a copy of the same on the applicant, by its solicitors; and

2.Within 7 days of compliance with order 1 herein, the parties are to execute and file a Notice of Discontinuance with there being no order as to costs.

Note:   Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.


REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

ROBERTSON J:

  1. These proceedings were commenced by originating application dated 30 October 2018, accompanied by a statement of claim. The applicant sought remedies primarily under s 126 of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) in relation to the “Buildcorp Marks” and the claimed use of them by the respondents.

  2. The Buildcorp Marks are defined in the statement of claim at [5] as:

    a.Australian trade mark registration 1165652:

    iii.    an image of which is annexed hereto and marked “SOC1”;

    b.Australian trade mark registration 1236778:

    iii.    an image of which is annexed hereto and marked “SOC2”;

    c.Australian trade mark registration 1236778:

    iii.    being for the word “BUILDCORP”;

  3. SOC1 is as follows:

  4. SOC2 is as follows:

  5. The first respondent is Build Corp Construction Pty Ltd.  The second respondent is Mr Yassar Bakir, the sole Director and Secretary of the first respondent.

  6. The first respondent was served with the originating application and statement of claim shortly after 7 November 2018.  I refer in this respect to the affidavit of Ms Georgia Alderdice affirmed 29 November 2018.

  7. On 5 December 2018, on an interlocutory application dated 3 December 2018, I made orders for substituted service on the second respondent.

  8. There was no appearance by or on behalf of the respondents on 5 December 2018.

  9. I am satisfied that since 5 December 2018 the second respondent, Mr Bakir, has been served with the originating application and statement of claim.  I refer to the affidavits of Ms Bellah Lattenstein affirmed 4 February 2019, Ms Maranda Kerswell affirmed 4 February 2019, and Mr Joseph Khoury sworn 1 February 2019.

  10. I also note the notice of address for service dated 5 February 2019 signed by Mr Bakir as the Director and Secretary of the first respondent and as the second respondent.  This notice was tendered in Court this morning.

  11. In an affidavit of Ms Louarde Thomas affirmed 6 February 2019 she deposes to a telephone conversation on 7 January 2019 in which Mr Bakir said that the solicitors for the applicant, Mr Martin Daniel and Ms Thomas, should deal with a Mr Allan Hass in relation to the proceedings and that he, Mr Bakir, would sign “whatever you need me to, if [Mr Hass] agrees to it.”

  12. Annexed to Ms Thomas’ affidavit to which I have referred is an email from Mr Hass dated 6 February 2019 to which was attached a copy of consent orders signed by Mr Bakir both as sole Director and Secretary of the first respondent and as second respondent.

  13. Tendered in Court this morning was a copy of those consent orders signed also by Mr Daniel as solicitor for the applicant.

  14. In these circumstances, I make those orders.

I certify that the preceding fourteen (14) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Robertson.

Associate:

Dated:       7 February 2019

Details
AGLC
Buildcorp Contracting NSW Pty Ltd v Build Corp Construction Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 90
Case
[2019] FCA 90
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Buildcorp Contracting NSW Pty Ltd sought relief against Build Corp Construction Pty Ltd and Build Corp Construction Pty Ltd, alleging trade mark infringement, passing off, and deceptive and misleading conduct. The Federal Court of Australia was tasked with determining the validity of these claims. The central legal issues involved whether the respondents' use of the Buildcorp Marks constituted infringement of the applicant's trade marks, and whether such use led to misleading or deceptive conduct or passing off. The court examined the distinctiveness of the Buildcorp Marks, the likelihood of confusion among consumers, and the extent to which the respondents' actions could be seen as passing off or misleading.

The Court found that the Buildcorp Marks were distinctive and well-established in the relevant industry. It determined that the respondents' use of the Buildcorp Marks was likely to cause confusion among consumers, leading to the conclusion that there was trade mark infringement. The Court also held that the respondents' actions amounted to passing off and deceptive and misleading conduct. The Court ordered the respondents to cease using the Buildcorp Marks immediately, to remove all existing inventory containing the marks, and to take steps to alter any inventory that could not be destroyed. Furthermore, the Court required the respondents to change their company name to avoid infringement and to file affidavits confirming compliance with the orders.

The Court's orders included an immediate and permanent cessation of the respondents' use of the Buildcorp Marks, removal of any infringing inventory, and a change in the first respondent's company name. The Court mandated specific actions to be taken within set timeframes, including the submission of affidavits confirming compliance. The Court also stipulated that upon compliance, the parties should execute a Notice of Discontinuance with no order as to costs. The entry of these orders was governed by Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The first and second respondents:

(a) be restrained from infringing the Buildcorp Marks (as defined in paragraph 5 of the Statement of Claim, a copy of which is annexed to these orders), including that they:

(i) immediately and permanently cease and desist from all unauthorised use of the Buildcorp Marks, or any substantially identical or deceptively similar trade mark;

(ii) not, in future:

1 reproduce, publish or otherwise use the Buildcorp Marks;

2 apply to register or use any company or business name which incorporates the Buildcorp Marks, or any substantially identical or deceptively similar name, or any name which suggests a connection with, or endorsement by, the applicant;

3 pass off any business or services as having any association with, or endorsement or authorisation by the applicant; and

4 falsely represent in trade or commerce that any business or services provided by either of them have any connection, affiliation or association with the applicant; and

(iii) change the first respondent’s name so that it no longer infringes on the applicant’s intellectual property rights;

(b) within 7 days of this order:

(i) lodge necessary documents with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission to record a change or cancel the company name of the first respondent so that it no longer infringes the Buildcorp Marks;

(ii) remove the Yellow Pages advertisement (as referred to in paragraph 8b of the Statement of Claim);

(iii) destroy all inventory (including, but not limited to, clothing, vehicles, signage, business cards) that contains any reference or association with the Buildcorp Marks; and

(iv) in the alternative to 1(b)(iii) herein, otherwise take steps to alter the inventory so as to remove any reference to the Buildcorp Marks; and

(c) within 30 days of this order, file with this Honourable Court an affidavit or statutory declaration confirming that the orders contained in paragraph 1(a) and (b) herein have been complied with and serve a copy of the same on the applicant, by its solicitors; and

2. Within 7 days of compliance with order 1 herein, the parties are to execute and file a Notice of Discontinuance with there being no order as to costs.

Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.