[2013] FWC 9398 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Brunel Technical Services Pty Ltd
(AG2013/11359)
DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK | MELBOURNE, 29 NOVEMBER 2013 |
Application for approval of the Brunel Technical Services Pty Ltd- AMWU - Gorgon Project - Barrow Island Greenfields Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Brunel Technical Services Pty Ltd- AMWU - Gorgon Project - Barrow Island Greenfields Agreement 2013 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act). It has been made by Brunel Technical Services Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a greenfields agreement.
[2] The Employer’s Declaration in Support of Application for Approval of Greenfields Agreement was made by Mr Colin Saunders, the Industrial Relations Advisor of Brunel Technical Services Pty Ltd. The Agreement was signed by Mr Craig Follett, the Director of Brunel Technical Services Pty Ltd and Mr Steve McCartney of the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU), State Secretary on 9 October 2013.
[3] Section 185(4) of the Act states that “if the agreement is a greenfields agreement, the application must be made within 14 days after the agreement is made”. There is no provision in the Act allowing me to extend the time for making of an application to approve a Greenfields Agreement. The application was lodged on 7 November 2013, over two weeks out of time.
[4] The application for approval is dismissed on the basis that the application was made out of time.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, PR545143>
- AGLC
- Brunel Technical Services Pty Ltd [2013] FWC 9398
- Case
- [2013] FWC 9398
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue that the court had to address was whether the agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009, specifically section 234, which governs the approval of enterprise agreements. This involved assessing whether the agreement was a genuine bargain between the parties, whether it contained the necessary minimum terms and conditions, and whether it was free from any prohibited content. The court also had to consider the procedural fairness of the FWC's decision-making process.
In its decision, the court found that the FWC had correctly applied the law in approving the agreement. The court confirmed that the agreement was a genuine bargain and contained all the required minimum terms and conditions. It was also satisfied that the agreement did not contain any prohibited content and that the FWC's decision-making process was fair and lawful. The court held that the FWC's decision to approve the agreement was valid and that the applicant's appeal should be dismissed.
The Federal Circuit Court of Australia dismissed the applicant's appeal and affirmed the FWC's decision to approve the Barrow Island Greenfields Agreement 2013. The court's decision upheld the FWC's assessment that the agreement met all the statutory requirements and was a fair and lawful industrial instrument.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.