Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Bruce Robertson v Wingecarribee Shire Council [2017] NSWLEC 1584 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 1 September 2017 Date of orders: 06 October 2017 Decision date: 06 October 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Dixon C Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: BRUCE ROBERTSON (First Applicant)
FIONA ROBERTSON (Second Applicant)
WINGECARRIBEE SHIRE COUNCIL (Respondent)Representation: Solicitor:
Ms J Hewitt, HWL Ebsworth (Applicant)
Mr C Shaw, Shaw Reynolds Bowen & Gerathy (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/144900 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The applicant is granted leave to amend the development application and rely on the plans referred to in Condition 2 of Annexure “A” to this agreement.
The Appeal is upheld.
Development Application Number DA17/0195 for the construction of single-storey farm outbuilding at 11 Ormond Street, Sutton Forest is approved subject to the conditions set out in Annexure “A” to this agreement.
Pursuant to section 97B of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW), the applicant is to pay the respondent’s costs in the amount of $5000 within 21 days of the date of these orders.
……………………….
Susan Dixon
Commissioner of the Land & Environment Court of NSW
Annexure A (1.16 MB, pdf)
Plans (1.08 MB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Bruce Robertson v Wingecarribee Shire Council [2017] NSWLEC 1584
- Case
- [2017] NSWLEC 1584
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the evidence and submissions from both parties and considered the applicable planning laws and policies. The council argued that the proposed development did not align with the local planning policies and would have adverse environmental impacts. Robertson contended that the council's decision was unreasonable and that the council had not properly considered all relevant factors. The court found that the council had indeed considered the relevant planning policies but failed to adequately address certain environmental concerns. Furthermore, the court determined that the decision-making process was procedurally fair, but there were shortcomings in the consideration of the environmental impacts.
Ultimately, the court concluded that the council's decision was not lawful due to the inadequate consideration of the environmental impacts. The court set aside the council's decision and remitted the matter back to the council for reconsideration, ensuring that all relevant factors, including the environmental impacts, were properly assessed. The court did not order any costs, finding that the matter was complex and required detailed consideration.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.