| [2014] FWCA 7694 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Brownes Foods Operations Pty Ltd
(AG2014/9612)
BROWNES FOODS OPERATIONS PTY LTD OPERATIONS AGREEMENT 2014-2017
Food, beverages and tobacco manufacturing industry | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT WATSON | MELBOURNE, 30 OCTOBER 2014 |
Application for approval of the Brownes Foods Operations Pty Ltd Operations Agreement 2014-2017.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Brownes Foods Operations Pty Ltd Operations Agreement 2014-2017 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Brownes Foods Operations Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia and The Transport Workers’ Union of Australia being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2), I note that the Agreement covers the organisations.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 6 November 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 May 2017.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE410890 PR557182>
- AGLC
- Brownes Foods Operations Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 7694
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 7694
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues that required determination were primarily whether the proposed agreement was fair and reasonable and whether it complied with the necessary legislative requirements under the Corporations Act. Specifically, the court had to assess if the agreement met the statutory provisions concerning the entitlements of employees and performance rights holders, as well as ensuring that the interests of these stakeholders were fairly balanced against those of the company.
Justice Edelman meticulously reviewed the terms of the proposed agreement, taking into account the statutory obligations and the principles of fairness and reasonableness. The court examined the nature and extent of the benefits and obligations under the agreement, considering the interests of all stakeholders. Ultimately, the court found that the agreement was fair and reasonable and complied with the legislative requirements. The judge approved the agreement, recognising the balanced approach taken towards the rights and interests of both the company and its employees and performance rights holders.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.