[2013] FWCA 320 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Brown Brothers Milawa Vineyard Pty Ltd
(AG2012/13189)
BROWN BROTHERS MILAWA VINEYARD AGREEMENT 2012
Wine industry | |
COMMISSIONER HAMPTON | ADELAIDE, 16 JANUARY 2013 |
Application for approval of the Brown Brothers Milawa Vineyard Agreement 2012.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Brown Brothers Milawa Vineyard Agreement 2012 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Brown Brothers Milawa Vineyard Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] On 15 January 2013, I conducted a telephone conference of the parties to seek clarification about aspects of the agreement.
[3] The employer subsequently provided further clarification of the parties’ intentions and proposed formal written undertakings which are appended to the agreement as approved.
[4] I have sought the views of the bargaining representatives and accepted the undertakings pursuant to s.190 of the Act. As a result, the undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[5] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[6] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 23 January 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 22 December 2015.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE899362 PR533196>
- AGLC
- Brown Brothers Milawa Vineyard Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 320
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 320
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In deliberating on the application, the court examined the proposed agreement's adherence to the requirements set out in the Fair Work Act. It assessed whether the agreement facilitated a more streamlined and efficient workplace by reducing complexity in employment arrangements. The court also considered if the agreement allowed for greater flexibility in work practices and if it contributed to enhancing workplace relations. The central concern was ensuring that the agreement did not undermine the rights of employees and maintained a fair balance between the interests of employers and employees.
After thorough examination, the court found that the Brown Brothers Milawa Vineyard Agreement 2012 did indeed meet the statutory criteria. It was concluded that the agreement provided a simplification of employment terms, introduced modern practices, and fostered better workplace relations without compromising employee rights. Therefore, the court approved the agreement, recognising its potential to benefit both the employer and the employees by creating a more efficient and harmonious working environment. The court's approval was formalised in its final orders, granting the application for endorsement of the agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.