Brown and Brown (Costs)

Case

[2007] FamCA 353

23 April 2007


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Brown and Brown (Costs) [2007] FamCA 353 [2007] FamCA 353 23 April 2007

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia, comprising Kay, Warnick and Boland JJ, considered an application for costs in proceedings between Brown and Brown. The underlying dispute concerned an application for an interlocutory injunction.

The primary legal issue before the Full Court was whether the unsuccessful party, Brown, should be ordered to pay the costs of the successful party, Brown, in relation to the interlocutory injunction proceedings. This involved an assessment of the conduct of the parties during the litigation and whether any exceptional circumstances warranted a departure from the usual rule that costs follow the event.

The Court applied the general principle that costs should follow the event, meaning the unsuccessful party should bear the costs of the successful party. However, the Court also considered whether the conduct of the parties warranted a different outcome. In this instance, the Court found no exceptional circumstances to justify deviating from the usual rule. Accordingly, the Court ordered that the unsuccessful party pay the costs of the successful party.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Civil Procedure

Legal Concepts

  • Costs

  • Appeal

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

1

Doran and Keyes and Anor [2017] FamCAFC 255
Cases Cited

1

Statutory Material Cited

7