Brotherhood of St Laurence

Case [2018] FWCA 7760


[2018] FWCA 7760
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Brotherhood of St Laurence
(AG2018/3048)

BROTHERHOOD OF ST LAURENCE COMMUNITY SERVICES ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2017

Social, community, home care and disability services

DEPUTY PRESIDENT SAUNDERS

SYDNEY, 21 DECEMBER 2018

Application for approval of the Brotherhood of St Laurence Community Services Enterprise Agreement 2017.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Brotherhood of St Laurence Community Services Enterprise Agreement 2017 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Brotherhood of St Laurence. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] The Employer has provided written undertakings (the Undertakings). A copy of the Undertakings is attached in Annexure A to this decision. I am satisfied that the effect of accepting the Undertakings is not likely to:

(a) cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement; or

(b) result in substantial changes to the Agreement.

[3] The views of each person who the Fair Work Commission knows is a bargaining representative for the Agreement have been sought in relation to the Undertakings.

[4] Pursuant to subsection 190(3) of the Act, I accept the Undertakings.

[5] Subject to the Undertakings, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[6] I note the following provisions are, or may be, inconsistent with the National Employment Standards;

  Clause S 10.1(i) of the agreement which provides annual leave in hours, instead of in weeks.

  Clause S 10.2 of the agreement which provides personal leave in hours, instead of in days; and

  Clause S 16.1(a) of the agreement which provides that notice will not be provided where employees abandon their employment, whereas clause S 17 provides a definition of abandonment of employment.

[7] Given the National Employment Standards precedence clause at Clause S.4 of the Agreement, I am satisfied that any more beneficial entitlements from the National Employment Standards will prevail over any provision of the Agreement which is less favourable.

[8] The Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

[9] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 28 December 2018. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 April 2021.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE501173  PR703387>

Annexure A

Details
AGLC
Brotherhood of St Laurence [2018] FWCA 7760
Case
[2018] FWCA 7760
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Brotherhood of St Laurence, a not-for-profit organisation providing community services, sought approval for its 2017 Community Services Enterprise Agreement (CSEA) from the Fair Work Commission. The application was contested by the Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU), which argued that certain provisions of the CSEA did not adequately protect the rights and entitlements of employees. The Fair Work Commission was tasked with determining whether the CSEA met the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009, including whether it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment.

The central legal issues before the Commission were whether certain provisions of the CSEA were fair and reasonable and whether they adequately protected the rights and entitlements of employees. The ACTU argued that several provisions, including those relating to pay rates, classification, and redundancy entitlements, did not provide adequate protections and were not consistent with the principles of the Fair Work Act. The Brotherhood of St Laurence defended the CSEA, arguing that it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment and was consistent with the principles of the Act.

The Fair Work Commission found that the CSEA provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment. The Commission noted that the Brotherhood of St Laurence had engaged in good faith bargaining with the ACTU and had made significant efforts to address the concerns raised by the Union. The Commission found that the CSEA provided for adequate pay rates, classification, and redundancy entitlements and was consistent with the principles of the Fair Work Act. The Commission approved the CSEA, subject to certain modifications to address the concerns raised by the ACTU.

The Fair Work Commission approved the Brotherhood of St Laurence Community Services Enterprise Agreement 2017, subject to certain modifications. The modifications included changes to the provisions relating to pay rates, classification, and redundancy entitlements. The Commission noted that the modifications were necessary to ensure that the CSEA provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment and was consistent with the principles of the Fair Work Act. The approval of the CSEA ensures that employees of the Brotherhood of St Laurence have access to fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment, while also providing the organisation with the flexibility it needs to deliver community services effectively.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.