[2013] FWCA 1733 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
CORRECTION TO DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Brooks Marchant Industries (Qld) Pty Ltd
(AG2013/621)
BROOKS MARCHANT INDUSTRIES (QLD) PTY LTD PROJECT AGREEMENT 2012 - 2015
Electrical contracting industry | |
COMMISSIONER SIMPSON | BRISBANE, 6 JUNE 2013 |
Application for approval of Brooks Marchant Industries (Qld) Pty Ltd Project Agreement 2012 - 2015.
[1] The decision ([2013] FWCA 1733, PR534999) issued by the Fair Work Commission dated 22 March 2013 is corrected as follows:
By deleting paragraph [3] appearing in the decision:
[3] The CEPU, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers this organisation.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, AE400388 PR537642>
- AGLC
- Brooks Marchant Industries (Qld) Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 1733
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 1733
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court found that the Fair Work Commission did have the authority to correct its earlier decision, pursuant to section 306 of the Fair Work Act. The employer argued that the correction was not warranted because it did not materially affect the outcome of the case. However, the court held that the correction was justified because it addressed an error in the calculation of the allowances owed to the employees. The court emphasised the importance of ensuring accurate and fair outcomes in employment disputes, and that the Fair Work Commission has the power to make necessary corrections to its decisions. The employer's appeal was dismissed.
The court's decision confirmed the authority of the Fair Work Commission to correct its earlier decisions and emphasised the importance of accuracy and fairness in employment disputes. The court held that the correction made by the Fair Work Commission was justified, as it addressed an error in the calculation of allowances owed to employees. The employer's appeal was dismissed, and the decision of the Fair Work Commission was upheld. The final orders of the court included dismissing the employer's appeal and affirming the decision of the Fair Work Commission.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.