Brook and Brook and Anor

The proceeding involved an application by RR Pty Ltd for costs incurred in complying with a subpoena issued by the husband. The application was heard by Macmillan J.

The sole legal issue before the court was whether RR Pty Ltd was entitled to recover the costs it incurred in responding to the subpoena.

Macmillan J dismissed the application for costs. The reasons for this decision are not detailed in the provided extract, but the outcome indicates that the court found no basis for ordering the husband to pay RR Pty Ltd's compliance costs.

The court ordered that the oral application made on behalf of RR Pty Ltd seeking conduct costs of complying with the subpoena issued by the husband on 21 October 2015 be dismissed.