Broadspectrum (Australia) Pty Ltd T/A Broadspectrum
Case
•
[2017] FWC 1818
•31 MARCH 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Broadspectrum (Australia) Pty Ltd T/A Broadspectrum [2017] FWC 1818
[2017] FWC 1818
31 MARCH 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Broadspectrum (Australia) Pty Ltd T/A Broadspectrum, applied to the Fair Work Commission for approval of the JBU Enterprise Agreement 2016. The applicants sought to have the agreement approved under section 173 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The dispute arose from a disagreement about whether the agreement was genuinely agreed to by the employees covered by it. The application was heard by the Commission and ultimately, the application was dismissed.
The primary issue before the Commission was whether the enterprise agreement was genuinely agreed to by the employees. The Commission examined whether there was sufficient evidence to show that the agreement had been properly negotiated and that the employees had genuinely agreed to its terms. The Commission also considered whether there had been any coercion or undue influence exerted on the employees that might have affected their ability to freely agree to the terms of the agreement.
The Commission found that there was insufficient evidence to establish that the agreement had been genuinely agreed to by the employees. The Commission noted that there were issues with the process of consultation and negotiation, and that there were concerns about the fairness of the agreement. The Commission also found that there was evidence of potential coercion and undue influence that could have affected the employees' ability to freely agree to the terms of the agreement. As a result, the Commission concluded that the agreement was not genuinely agreed to by the employees and dismissed the application for approval.
The Fair Work Commission dismissed the application for approval of the JBU Enterprise Agreement 2016, finding that there was insufficient evidence to establish that the agreement had been genuinely agreed to by the employees. The Commission also found that there were issues with the process of consultation and negotiation, and that there were concerns about the fairness of the agreement. The Commission concluded that the agreement was not genuinely agreed to by the employees and therefore, it was not approved.
The primary issue before the Commission was whether the enterprise agreement was genuinely agreed to by the employees. The Commission examined whether there was sufficient evidence to show that the agreement had been properly negotiated and that the employees had genuinely agreed to its terms. The Commission also considered whether there had been any coercion or undue influence exerted on the employees that might have affected their ability to freely agree to the terms of the agreement.
The Commission found that there was insufficient evidence to establish that the agreement had been genuinely agreed to by the employees. The Commission noted that there were issues with the process of consultation and negotiation, and that there were concerns about the fairness of the agreement. The Commission also found that there was evidence of potential coercion and undue influence that could have affected the employees' ability to freely agree to the terms of the agreement. As a result, the Commission concluded that the agreement was not genuinely agreed to by the employees and dismissed the application for approval.
The Fair Work Commission dismissed the application for approval of the JBU Enterprise Agreement 2016, finding that there was insufficient evidence to establish that the agreement had been genuinely agreed to by the employees. The Commission also found that there were issues with the process of consultation and negotiation, and that there were concerns about the fairness of the agreement. The Commission concluded that the agreement was not genuinely agreed to by the employees and therefore, it was not approved.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Employment & Labour Law
Legal Concepts
-
Collective Bargaining
-
Industrial Action
-
Good Faith
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Karijini Rail Pty Limited [2019] FWC 2907
Cases Citing This Decision
10
Broadspectrum (Australia) Pty Ltd v United Voice
[2018] FCAFC 139
Broadspectrum Limited t/a Broadspectrum v United Voice
[2017] FWCFB 3202
Karijini Rail Pty Limited
[2019] FWC 2907
Cases Cited
11
Statutory Material Cited
0
Broadspectrum (Australia) Pty Ltd T/A Broadspectrum
[2016] FWCA 8209
Broadspectrum (Australia) Pty Ltd T/A Broadspectrum
[2016] FWC 7936