| [2025] FWCA 3431 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Bridgestone Australia Ltd. Trading AS Bridgestone Australia
(AG2025/3244)
BANDAG MANUFACTURING PTY LTD – ENGINEERING – ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2025
| Manufacturing and associated industries | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT LAKE | BRISBANE, 13 OCTOBER 2025 |
Application for approval of the Bandag Manufacturing Pty Ltd – Engineering – Enterprise Agreement 2025
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Bandag Manufacturing Pty Ltd – Engineering – Enterprise Agreement 2025 (the Agreement). The Application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Bridgestone Australia Ltd. Trading AS Bridgestone Australia (the Applicant). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
The Applicant has provided written undertakings. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
The Agreement does not contain a delegates’ rights term compliant with the Act. Pursuant to s.205A(2) of the Act, the workplace delegates’ rights term prescribed by the Manufacturing and Associated Industries and Occupations Award 2020 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
I observe that the following provisions are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES):
Clause 41.5 – Redundancy
Clause 40.1(e) – Notice of Termination
Clause 20.1 – Abandonment of Employment.
Noting clause 3.1 of the Agreement, I am satisfied that the more beneficial entitlements of the National Employment Standards (NES) in the Act will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.
The “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) lodged a Form F18 statutory declaration giving notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note the Agreement covers the AMWU.
Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each requirement of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval.
The Agreement is approved and will operate in accordance with s.54 of the Act. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 September 2026.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE530753 PR792614>
- AGLC
- Bridgestone Australia Ltd. Trading AS Bridgestone Australia [2025] FWCA 3431
- Case
- [2025] FWCA 3431
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court needed to determine whether the agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act, particularly regarding financial detriment to employees, consistency with the National Employment Standards, and the inclusion of necessary terms such as delegates’ rights. The court found that while the agreement did not explicitly include a delegates’ rights term, the prescribed term from the Manufacturing and Associated Industries and Occupations Award 2020 would be incorporated. Some provisions were identified as potentially inconsistent with the National Employment Standards; however, the court was satisfied that the more beneficial entitlements would prevail where discrepancies arose.
The Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union, known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU), had declared its intention for the agreement to cover its members. The court confirmed that the agreement indeed covered the AMWU, complying with the statutory requirements. With the satisfactory undertakings and the resolution of potential inconsistencies, the court approved the agreement, which will be effective from its nominal expiry date of 30 September 2026.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.