| [2015] FWCA 6536 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Bridgestone Australia Ltd
(AG2015/5542)
BRIDGESTONE AUSTRALIA LTD (NSW COMMERCIAL STORES - WETHERILL PARK, EASTERN CREEK, SILVERWATER AND UNANDERRA) EMPLOYEE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015
Vehicle industry | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT O'CALLAGHAN | ADELAIDE, 24 SEPTEMBER 2015 |
Application for approval of the Bridgestone Australia Ltd (NSW Commercial Stores - Wetherill Park, Eastern Creek, Silverwater and Unanderra) Employee Enterprise Agreement 2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Bridgestone Australia Ltd (NSW Commercial Stores - Wetherill Park, Eastern Creek, Silverwater and Unanderra) Employee Enterprise Agreement 2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Bridgestone Australia Ltd. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] As the Agreement does not contain a consultation term which meets the requirements of s.205 of the Act, the model consultation term is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 2 October 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 17 April 2017.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE415831 PR572156>
- AGLC
- Bridgestone Australia Ltd [2015] FWCA 6536
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 6536
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine whether the application met the criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act. Specifically, the court needed to assess whether the agreement was made in good faith, was free from coercion and undue influence, and did not have a detrimental effect on the test employee. The court also needed to consider whether the agreement met the "better off overall test" and whether it contained the minimum terms and conditions required by the Act.
The court found that the application met the criteria for approval. The court found that the agreement was made in good faith and was free from coercion and undue influence. The court also found that the agreement did not have a detrimental effect on the test employee and met the better off overall test. The court further found that the agreement contained the minimum terms and conditions required by the Act.
The court approved the agreement as a registered agreement under the Fair Work Act. The court also ordered that the agreement be registered with the Fair Work Commission and published on the Commission's website. The order was made on 22 July 2015.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.