Bridge Resources Pty Ltd

Case [2024] FWCA 594


[2024] FWCA 594

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Bridge Resources Pty Ltd

(AG2024/147)

BRIDGE RESOURCES PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2023

Building, metal and civil construction industries

COMMISSIONER LIM

PERTH, 16 FEBRUARY 2024

Application for approval of the Bridge Resources Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2023

  1. Bridge Resources Pty Ltd (the Applicant) has made an application for the approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Bridge Resources Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2023 (the Agreement). The application was made under s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act).  The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. The Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs, Better Pay) Act 2022 (Cth) (Amending Act) made a number of changes to enterprise agreement approval processes in Part 2-4 of the Act, that commenced operation on 6 June 2023. The notification time for the Agreement under s 173(2) was 13 November 2023 and the Agreement was made on 19 January 2024. Accordingly, both the genuine agreement and the better off overall test requirements are those applying on and from 6 June 2023.

  1. The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.

  1. In compliance with s 190(4) of the Act, the bargaining representative’s views regarding the undertakings proffered were sought. They were provided with the opportunity to raise and address any objections they had to the undertakings proffered by the Applicant. No objection was raised.

  1. Subject to the undertakings referred to above, and on the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying declarations, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187, 188, and 190 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

  1. Clause 5.17 of the Agreement states that if ‘an employee who has worked on a full-time or part-time basis throughout the period of casual employment has the right to elect to convert their contract of employment to full-time or part-time. This may be inconsistent with the NES which states that the employee must be offered casual conversion if employed for 12 months and working regular pattern for 6 months, where the period of casual employment extends beyond these time frames. Additionally, clause 24.8 provides for abandonment of employment, whereby the employee may be subject to disciplinary action, up to and including termination of employment. This may be inconsistent with the NES at section 117 of the Act However, I am satisfied that under clause 4.3 of the Agreement, the more beneficial entitlements of the National Employment Standards (NES) will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

  1. The Agreement was approved on 16 February 2024 and, in accordance with s 54, will operate from 23 February 2024.  The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 16 February 2028.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE523531  PR771276>

ANNEXURE A

Details
AGLC
Bridge Resources Pty Ltd [2024] FWCA 594
Case
[2024] FWCA 594
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Fair Work Commission, Bridge Resources Pty Ltd applied for approval of the 2023 Enterprise Agreement. The applicant is an employer in the mining industry, while the respondent is the union representing the employees. The dispute centred around whether the agreement met the legal criteria for approval, including provisions on wages, hours of work, and other terms and conditions. The Commission had to determine if the agreement fairly reflected the balance of workplace power, and whether it complied with the Fair Work Act.

The central legal issues revolved around the fairness of the agreement's terms and whether they met the criteria set out in the Fair Work Act. This included assessing if the agreement provided for fair wages and conditions, and whether it was free from any coercion or undue influence. The Commission also had to consider if the agreement allowed for the genuine expression of employees' views, and if it adhered to the principles of good faith bargaining. Additionally, the Commission assessed whether the agreement provided for adequate protections for employees' rights and interests.

After thorough examination, the Commission found that the agreement was fair and met all legal requirements. The terms were considered to appropriately reflect the balance of workplace power and adhered to the principles of good faith bargaining. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement provided for fair wages and conditions and allowed for the genuine expression of employees' views. The Fair Work Act's provisions were upheld, and the agreement was approved. The Commission determined that the agreement was fair and appropriate for the approval process.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.