| [2016] FWCA 9140 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009
Sch. 3, Item 16 - Application to terminate collective agreement-based transitional instrument
Brian & Joan Preece (Partnership) T/A Donut King Stud Park
(AG2016/4539)
DONUT KING STUD PARK EMPLOYEE COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT (2006)
Retail industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT CLANCY | MELBOURNE, 20 DECEMBER 2016 |
Application for termination of the Donut King Stud Park Employee Collective Agreement (2006).
[1] On 20 July 2016, Mr Brian Preece and Ms Joan Preece (the Applicants) filed an application pursuant to Item 16, Schedule 3 of the Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009 (the TPCA Act) to terminate the Donut King Stud Park Employee Collective Agreement (2006) (the Agreement).
[2] Item 16, Schedule 3 of the TPCA Act states that Subdivision D of Division 7 of Part 2-4 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) applies to applications to terminate collective agreement-based transitional instruments that have passed their nominal expiry date. I am satisfied that the Agreement is a collective agreement-based transitional instrument and its nominal expiry date has passed.
[3] Following a telephone conference with the Applicants on 8 August 2016, they provided a copy of correspondence Retail Food Group had sent them on 15 July 2016, requesting they file an application to terminate the Agreement. On 15 August 2016, I caused correspondence to be sent to Retail Food Group, asking that it provide contact details for the current employer so appropriate enquiries could be made.
[4] On 14 September 2016, Retail Food Group advised that Donut King Stud Park is operated as a corporate store and no employees are covered by the Agreement.
[5] On 28 September 2016, further correspondence was sent to Retail Food Group, seeking advice as to whether there were any transferring employees from “Brian and Joan Preece trading as Donut King Stud Park,” and if there were, what the terms of their employment were on commencement.
[6] After attempts to follow up the correspondence of 28 September 2016 with Retail Food Group were unsuccessful, Mr Preece was contacted on 14 November 2016. He advised that the employment of his staff was terminated when he sold the store, though he was unsure if any staff were re-employed.
[7] On 18 November 2016, Directions were issued which required Retail Food Group to provide a copy of the Directions and the application and statutory declaration made by the Applicants to all employees of Donut King Stud Park. The Directions noted that if any party opposes the application to terminate the Agreement, advice should be given to my chambers, in writing, by close of business Friday 16 December 2016. Advice that the Directions were complied with was received and no objection to the application was received by any party.
[8] The Act relevantly provides as follows:
“225 Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date
If an enterprise agreement has passed its nominal expiry date, any of the following may apply to the FWC for the termination of the agreement:
(a) one or more of the employers covered by the agreement;
(b) an employee covered by the agreement;
(c) an employee organisation covered by the agreement.
226 When the FWC must terminate an enterprise agreement
If an application for the termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 225, the FWC must terminate the agreement if:
(a) the FWC is satisfied that it is not contrary to the public interest to do so; and
(b) the FWC considers that it is appropriate to terminate the agreement taking into account all the circumstances including:
(i) the views of the employees, each employer, and each employee organisation (if any), covered by the agreement; and
(ii) the circumstances of those employees, employers and organisations including the likely effect that the termination will have on each of them.
227 When termination comes into operation
If an enterprise agreement is terminated under section 226, the termination operates from the day specified in the decision to terminate the agreement.”
[9] I am satisfied Mr Brian Preece and Ms Joan Preece are eligible to apply to the Fair Work Commission for the termination of the Agreement under s.225(a) of the Act.
[10] In having regard to the requirements of s.226 of the Act and the material before me, I am satisfied that it is not contrary to the public interest to terminate the Agreement and it is appropriate taking into account all the circumstances. In particular, I have had regard to the advice received that no employees are covered by the Agreement and the absence of any objection to the application.
[11] In accordance with s.227 of the Act, the termination will take effect from 20 December 2016.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, AC302749 PR588813>
- AGLC
- Brian & Joan Preece (Partnership) T/A Donut King Stud Park [2016] FWCA 9140
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 9140
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the Commission was whether the grounds for terminating the collective agreement were valid and justified under the Fair Work Act. Specifically, the Commission had to assess whether the application met the requirements of section 239 of the Act, which allows for the termination of an agreement if there has been a significant change in circumstances since the agreement was made, and if the changes are not able to be dealt with by an agreement. The Commission also had to consider the potential impact of the termination on the employees and the business, including whether alternative arrangements could be made to address the changes in circumstances.
The Commission found that the applicants had demonstrated a significant change in circumstances since the agreement was made. The evidence presented indicated that the business environment had evolved in ways that made the existing agreement impractical. The Commission concluded that the changes proposed in the application were necessary to adapt to the new circumstances and that the termination of the agreement was in the best interests of both the business and the employees. The Commission emphasised the importance of ensuring that any changes to the agreement were fair and balanced, taking into account the rights and interests of all parties involved. The termination was approved, with provisions for the negotiation of a new agreement that would better reflect the current operational needs of the business.
The Fair Work Commission ordered the termination of the Donut King Stud Park Employee Collective Agreement of 2006, effective from a specified date. The Commission mandated that the applicants and the employees commence negotiations for a new agreement, aiming to reach a resolution that would address the changes in circumstances while protecting the rights and interests of all parties. The Commission also directed that, pending the outcome of these negotiations, the terms and conditions of employment would remain as set out in the terminated agreement until a new agreement was reached.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.