Brereton v Higgins
Case
•
[2004] NSWCA 48
•1 March 2004
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Brereton v Higgins [2004] NSWCA 48
[2004] NSWCA 48
1 March 2004
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The parties to this matter were Brereton and Higgins. The dispute concerned an application for leave to appeal an order made by the court below. The application was heard by Giles JA, Stein AJA, and Campbell J.
The central legal issue before the court was whether there was an error of principle in the exercise of discretion by the court below regarding costs. Specifically, the question was whether the order that each party pay their own costs, following a discontinuance, constituted such an error.
The court determined that there was no question of principle involved in the exercise of discretion concerning the costs order. Consequently, leave to appeal was refused. No order was made as to the costs of the application for leave to appeal.
The central legal issue before the court was whether there was an error of principle in the exercise of discretion by the court below regarding costs. Specifically, the question was whether the order that each party pay their own costs, following a discontinuance, constituted such an error.
The court determined that there was no question of principle involved in the exercise of discretion concerning the costs order. Consequently, leave to appeal was refused. No order was made as to the costs of the application for leave to appeal.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Appeal
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Brereton v Higgins [2004] NSWCA 48
Most Recent Citation
Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd v Mahaffy (No. 2) [2012] NSWDC 236
Cases Citing This Decision
2
Young v Kruger
[2012] NSWSC 628
Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd v Mahaffy (No. 2)
[2012] NSWDC 236
Cases Cited
4
Statutory Material Cited
0
Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li
[2013] HCA 18
Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li
[2013] HCA 18
National Parks and Wildlife Service v Pierson
[2002] NSWCA 273