[2013] FWCA 1879 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Breakwater Island Limited t/a Jupiters Townsville
(AG2013/279)
JUPITERS TOWNSVILLE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013
Hospitality industry | |
COMMISSIONER ASBURY | BRISBANE, 26 MARCH 2013 |
Jupiters Townsville Enterprise Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Jupiters Townsville Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Breakwater Island Limited t/a Jupiters Townsville. The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Australian Workers’ Union, being the bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that the organisation wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] On 25 March 2013 undertakings were provided by the Employer. Pursuant to s.190 of the Act, I accept the Employer’s undertakings. In accordance with s.201(3) of the Act I note that a copy of the undertakings is attached to the Agreement and forms part of the Agreement.
[5] The Agreement does not contain a flexibility clause. Pursuant s.202(4) of the Act, the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 1 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[6] The Agreement does not contain a model consultation clause. Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 2 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[7] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 2 April 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2016.
COMMISSIONER
1 Section 2.08 and Schedule 2.2 of the Fair Work Regulations 2009
2 Section 2.09 and Schedule 2.3 of the Fair Work Regulations 2009
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE400489 PR535191>
- AGLC
- Breakwater Island Limited t/a Jupiters Townsville [2013] FWCA 1879
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 1879
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the enterprise agreement allowed for employees to work on public holidays without the requisite penalty rates. This involved interpreting specific clauses of the agreement and determining their scope and effect. Additionally, the court had to consider whether the agreement's terms were consistent with the broader principles of the Fair Work Act 2009. The matter required a detailed analysis of the language used in the agreement and how it interacted with statutory requirements.
In its decision, the Fair Work Commission found that certain provisions of the Jupiters Townsville Enterprise Agreement 2013 did permit employees to work on public holidays without receiving the correct penalty rates. The court emphasised the importance of clear and unambiguous language in enterprise agreements to avoid disputes and ensure compliance with the Fair Work Act. It concluded that the agreement's terms were not consistent with the statutory requirements for public holiday work. The Commission made a determination that the enterprise agreement was invalid to the extent that it allowed for such practices, and it required the employer to rectify the situation by ensuring appropriate penalty rates were paid to employees working on public holidays.
The Fair Work Commission ordered that Breakwater Island Limited must review and amend the Jupiters Townsville Enterprise Agreement 2013 to ensure compliance with the Fair Work Act. The employer was directed to pay the correct penalty rates to employees who worked on public holidays and to review any historical payments to rectify any underpayments. The decision underscored the importance of clear enterprise agreements that align with statutory obligations to avoid future disputes and ensure fair treatment of employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.