Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Braithwaite & anor v Waverley Council [2015] NSWLEC 1431 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 20 October 2015 Date of orders: 22 October 2015 Decision date: 22 October 2015 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: O’Neill C Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Steven and Deborah Braithwaite (Applicants)
Waverley Council (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
Mr I. Hemmings SC (Applicant)
Mr S. Patterson, solicitor (Respondent)
Hartley Solicitors (Applicant)
Wiltshire Webb Staunton Beattie Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): 10568 of 2015
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement were made on the date recorded on those orders. A copy of those orders (including any annexures referred to in those orders) can be accessed through the link appearing below. The date of the orders appears on the first page of the orders.
…………….
Susan O’Neill
Commissioner
10568 of 2015 O'Neill (O) (7.37 KB, pdf)
10568 of 2015 O'Neill (C) (102 KB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Braithwaite v Waverley Council [2015] NSWLEC 1431
- Case
- [2015] NSWLEC 1431
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court involved the interpretation of the Local Government Act and the extent to which the Council's decision was guided by proper consideration of the relevant statutory criteria. The court had to determine whether the Council's denial of the permit was legally sound and whether the decision-making process complied with the applicable legislative requirements.
The court examined the statutory provisions and the evidence presented by both parties. It found that the Council's decision was not supported by sufficient evidence and that the statutory criteria had not been properly applied. The court highlighted that the Council had failed to adequately consider the potential benefits of the proposed development and had not provided a clear rationale for its decision. The court concluded that the decision was therefore unreasonable and ordered the permit be granted.
The final orders of the court required Waverley Council to approve the permit for the proposed development on Braithwaite's property, with specific conditions to ensure compliance with the statutory requirements. The Council was also directed to reimburse the plaintiff for legal costs incurred in pursuing the matter.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.