Bradnam's Windows and Doors Pty Ltd

Case [2019] FWCA 3398


[2019] FWCA 3398
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Bradnam's Windows and Doors Pty Ltd
(AG2019/1136)

BRADNAM'S WINDOWS & DOORS PTY LTD (ROCKHAMPTON) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2018

Manufacturing and associated industries

COMMISSIONER HARPER-GREENWELL

MELBOURNE, 16 MAY 2019

Application for approval of the Bradnam's Windows & Doors Pty Ltd (Rockhampton) Enterprise Agreement 2018.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Bradnam’s Windows & Doors Pty Ltd (Rockhampton) Enterprise Agreement 2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Bradnam’s Windows and Doors Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.

[3] I observe that clause 15.3(c) of the Agreement is likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES) in that it provides that an employee’s entitlement to personal leave is dependent upon the employee notifying their supervisor/manager by their normal start time as to the reason for their absence and estimated duration, whereas the NES provides that such notification is to be provided as soon as practicable, which may be a time after the leave has started. However, noting that clause 15.3 of the Agreement provides that employees are entitled to personal leave in accordance with the Act, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

[4] The Agreement was approved on 16 May 2019 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 23 May 2019. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2020.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE503477  PR708380>

Details
AGLC
Bradnam's Windows and Doors Pty Ltd [2019] FWCA 3398
Case
[2019] FWCA 3398
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Bradnam's Windows and Doors Pty Ltd applied to the Fair Work Commission for the approval of the Bradnam's Windows & Doors Pty Ltd (Rockhampton) Enterprise Agreement 2018. The application was made under section 234 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The dispute involved the terms and conditions of employment for the workers under the enterprise agreement, specifically focusing on the classification of employees and their associated pay rates.

The court had to determine whether the enterprise agreement complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act and whether it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment. The central issue was whether the agreement appropriately classified the employees and provided adequate pay rates, taking into account the roles and responsibilities of the employees and industry standards.

In reaching its decision, the Fair Work Commission examined the submissions from both Bradnam's Windows and Doors Pty Ltd and the employees' representatives. It considered the fairness and reasonableness of the proposed terms and conditions, the classification of employees, and the associated pay rates. The Commission found that the proposed enterprise agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act and provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment. The Commission approved the enterprise agreement, noting that it appropriately classified the employees and provided adequate pay rates. The court ordered the approval of the Bradnam's Windows & Doors Pty Ltd (Rockhampton) Enterprise Agreement 2018, effective from the date of the decision.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.