| [2013] FWCA 7154 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.210—Enterprise agreement
Bradken Resources Pty Ltd
(AG2013/2641)
BRADKEN RESOURCES PTY LTD WUNDOWIE SITE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2011
| Manufacturing and associated industries | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT MCCARTHY | PERTH, 19 SEPTEMBER 2013 |
Application for variation of the Bradken Resources Pty Ltd Wundowie Site Enterprise Agreement 2011.
An application has been made by Bradken Resources Pty Ltd for variation of the Bradken Resources Pty Ltd Wundowie Site Enterprise Agreement 2011 (the Agreement) as follows:
By deleting Clause 10.8(b) and replacing with a new Clause 10.8 (b) that reads:
”Once the employee has taken any five days of sick leave without a signed certificate from a medical practitioner, or proof to satisfy a reasonable person, during the year, proof is required on the first day of sick leave.”
The variation as approved will come into force on 19 September 2013.
A consolidated copy of the Agreement is attached to this decision.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, AE888459 PR542010>
- AGLC
- Bradken Resources Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 7154
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 7154
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court were the interpretation and application of certain clauses in the enterprise agreement, particularly those concerning shift patterns and overtime entitlements. The applicants argued that variations were necessary to improve operational efficiency and align the agreement with current business practices. The respondents contended that the proposed changes would negatively impact their working conditions and entitlements.
The court found that the applicants had not demonstrated that the proposed variations met the criteria for being "in the national system interest" as required by section 234 of the Fair Work Act. The court was satisfied that the existing agreement was fair and reasonable, and the proposed changes would not result in a significant improvement to the operation of the business or the working conditions of the employees. The application for variation was therefore dismissed. The court emphasised that any changes to the agreement must be in the interest of both the employer and the employees and must not disadvantage the employees.
No further orders were made by the court.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.