Bowie and Bowie-Smith Pty Ltd and Bartlett
Case
•
[2007] FamCA 1200
•10 October 2007
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Bowie and Bowie-Smith Pty Ltd and Bartlett [2007] FamCA 1200
[2007] FamCA 1200
10 October 2007
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The District Court of New South Wales, presided over by Faulks DCJ, considered a dispute between the applicants, Bowie and Bowie-Smith Pty Ltd and Bartlett, and the respondent. The precise nature of the underlying dispute is not detailed, but the judgment focuses on the costs associated with previous applications heard by the Court on 12 May 2005, 15 February 2006, and 16 April 2007.
The primary legal issue before the Court was the determination of the quantum and basis of the costs to be awarded to the applicants in relation to these specific hearings. The Court was required to decide whether the respondent should be ordered to pay the applicants' reasonable expenses, including legal costs, and the extent to which such costs should be indemnified.
Faulks DCJ ordered that the respondent pay the reasonable expenses of the applicants incurred in relation to the specified hearings, including their legal costs. These costs were to be assessed or agreed on a basis that provided the applicants with complete indemnification, save for any amounts that were unreasonable in amount or unreasonably incurred. The Court also dismissed the balance of any outstanding applications by the applicants.
The primary legal issue before the Court was the determination of the quantum and basis of the costs to be awarded to the applicants in relation to these specific hearings. The Court was required to decide whether the respondent should be ordered to pay the applicants' reasonable expenses, including legal costs, and the extent to which such costs should be indemnified.
Faulks DCJ ordered that the respondent pay the reasonable expenses of the applicants incurred in relation to the specified hearings, including their legal costs. These costs were to be assessed or agreed on a basis that provided the applicants with complete indemnification, save for any amounts that were unreasonable in amount or unreasonably incurred. The Court also dismissed the balance of any outstanding applications by the applicants.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
4
Statutory Material Cited
2
Bartlett & Gibson
[2007] FamCA 113
Colgate-Palmolive Co v Cussons Pty ltd
[1993] FCA 801
Colgate-Palmolive Co v Cussons Pty ltd
[1993] FCA 801