Bouchard and Lyall and Anor

Case

[2012] FamCA 766

6 September 2012


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
BOUCHARD & LYALL AND ANOR [2012] FamCA 766 [2012] FamCA 766 6 September 2012

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of *Bouchard and Lyall and Anor*, Forrest J of the Family Court of Australia made orders concerning the parenting of four children. The dispute involved the mother and two fathers regarding the future care and responsibility for the children.

The court was required to determine the specific arrangements for parental responsibility, the children's living arrangements, and the extent and nature of the mother's time with the children. Additionally, the court considered issues relating to communication between the mother and children, travel arrangements, and the need for therapeutic assistance for the mother. The court also addressed the supervision of compliance with the orders and specific information exchange between the parents.

Forrest J ordered that all previous parenting orders and injunctions be discharged. The First Respondent father was granted sole parental responsibility for the children K and T, who were ordered to live with him. Similarly, the Second Respondent father was granted sole parental responsibility for the children M and R, who were also ordered to live with him. The mother's time with all four children was to be supervised, initially for two hours each fortnight, with provisions for private supervision should the initial arrangement cease. The court also imposed specific communication protocols, including telephone calls and restrictions on the mother discussing certain sensitive topics with the children or attending their schools without consent. Injunctions were also made against both parents regarding denigration of each other.

The court further ordered that the mother undertake psychotherapy, with the costs to be determined between her and the chosen therapist. The Independent Children's Lawyer was authorised to publish an account of the proceedings and to provide information to the mother's therapist. Compliance with the orders was to be supervised by a Family Consultant. The court also detailed specific information the fathers were to provide to the mother regarding the children's well-being and education. The Independent Children's Lawyer was discharged on a specified date, and all extant applications were dismissed.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Family Law

  • Civil Procedure

Legal Concepts

  • Injunction

  • Costs

  • Jurisdiction

  • Procedural Fairness

  • Remedies

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

2

Statutory Material Cited

1

Preston v Preston [2011] FamCA 618
Heath & Hemming (No 2) [2011] FamCA 749