Bosanac v Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia & Ors
Case
•
[2019] HCATrans 209
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Bosanac v Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia & Ors [2019] HCATrans 209
[2019] HCATrans 209
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The applicant, Mr Bosanac, sought to appeal against decisions of the Commissioner of Taxation. The proceedings involved the Commissioner of Taxation, the Federal Court of Australia constituted by Justice Steward, and the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia constituted by Justices Greenwood, Burley, and Colvin. The dispute concerned the correct assessment of tax liabilities for several years, specifically focusing on the effect of conclusive evidence provisions and the burden of proof in tax appeals.
The central legal issue before the High Court was the interpretation of section 50-10 of the *Taxation Administration Act 1953* (Cth) (formerly section 177 of the *Income Tax Assessment Act 1936* (Cth) and section 39 of the *Income Tax Assessment Act 1922* (Cth)), which provides that a notice of assessment is conclusive evidence of its correctness, and section 14ZZO of the *Taxation Administration Act 1953* (Cth) (formerly section 190(b)), which deals with the burden of proof on a taxpayer appealing an assessment. The applicant argued that the relevant assessment for the purpose of these provisions was the "further amended assessment" that arose after an objection decision, rather than the assessment that was initially objected to.
The applicant's argument, supported by references to *Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Dalco* (1987) 168 CLR 614 and *Federal Commissioner of Taxation v ANZ* (1994) 181 CLR 466, was that where a Commissioner allows an objection in part and issues a further amended assessment, that further amended assessment becomes the operative assessment. Consequently, the conclusive evidence provisions and the burden of proof provisions apply to the amounts contained within this subsequent assessment. The applicant contended that the court's jurisdiction was engaged by the appeal against this further amended assessment, and the taxpayer was not limited to the original grounds of objection if the Commissioner introduced new elements of liability in the objection decision. The applicant further submitted that the notice of appeal specifically identified the amounts in the Commissioner's objection decision and the resulting further amended assessments as the subject of the dispute.
The central legal issue before the High Court was the interpretation of section 50-10 of the *Taxation Administration Act 1953* (Cth) (formerly section 177 of the *Income Tax Assessment Act 1936* (Cth) and section 39 of the *Income Tax Assessment Act 1922* (Cth)), which provides that a notice of assessment is conclusive evidence of its correctness, and section 14ZZO of the *Taxation Administration Act 1953* (Cth) (formerly section 190(b)), which deals with the burden of proof on a taxpayer appealing an assessment. The applicant argued that the relevant assessment for the purpose of these provisions was the "further amended assessment" that arose after an objection decision, rather than the assessment that was initially objected to.
The applicant's argument, supported by references to *Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Dalco* (1987) 168 CLR 614 and *Federal Commissioner of Taxation v ANZ* (1994) 181 CLR 466, was that where a Commissioner allows an objection in part and issues a further amended assessment, that further amended assessment becomes the operative assessment. Consequently, the conclusive evidence provisions and the burden of proof provisions apply to the amounts contained within this subsequent assessment. The applicant contended that the court's jurisdiction was engaged by the appeal against this further amended assessment, and the taxpayer was not limited to the original grounds of objection if the Commissioner introduced new elements of liability in the objection decision. The applicant further submitted that the notice of appeal specifically identified the amounts in the Commissioner's objection decision and the resulting further amended assessments as the subject of the dispute.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Tax Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Jurisdiction
-
Statutory Construction
-
Res Judicata
-
Standing
-
Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Bosanac v Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia & Ors [2019] HCATrans 209
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
2
Statutory Material Cited
0
Federal Commissioner of Taxation v ANZ Savings Bank Ltd
[1994] HCA 58
Federal Commissioner of Taxation v ANZ Savings Bank Ltd
[1994] HCA 58
Young v Child Support Registrar
[2009] FCA 120