Bosanac v Commissioner of Taxation
Case
•
[2018] FCA 946
•22 June 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Bosanac v Commissioner of Taxation [2018] FCA 946
[2018] FCA 946
22 June 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Bosanac sought to appeal a decision of the Commissioner of Taxation, which disallowed objections to notices of amended assessment. The dispute centred around the validity of the amended assessments and assessments of shortfall penalty that resulted from the Commissioner’s exclusion of Bosanac from the “Project DO IT” initiative. Bosanac argued that the assessments were excessive and challenged the validity of the resulting assessments and penalties under section 39B of the Judiciary Act 1903.
The court had to decide whether Bosanac discharged the onus of proving that the impugned assessments were excessive and whether the reliance on the “Project DO IT” initiative was justiciable in tax appeals under Part IVC of the Act. The court also needed to determine whether the exclusion of Bosanac from the initiative was valid and whether it led to the excessive assessments.
The court found that the factual basis for Bosanac’s claim regarding the “Project DO IT” initiative had been rejected, and thus, the challenge under section 39B failed. Consequently, the court dismissed Bosanac’s application for relief under section 39B entirely. Each proceeding was dismissed with costs as agreed or assessed, and entry of orders was dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
The court had to decide whether Bosanac discharged the onus of proving that the impugned assessments were excessive and whether the reliance on the “Project DO IT” initiative was justiciable in tax appeals under Part IVC of the Act. The court also needed to determine whether the exclusion of Bosanac from the initiative was valid and whether it led to the excessive assessments.
The court found that the factual basis for Bosanac’s claim regarding the “Project DO IT” initiative had been rejected, and thus, the challenge under section 39B failed. Consequently, the court dismissed Bosanac’s application for relief under section 39B entirely. Each proceeding was dismissed with costs as agreed or assessed, and entry of orders was dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Taxation Law
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Judicial Review
-
Limitation Periods
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
CMYT JDRJ and Commissioner of Taxation (Taxation and business) [2025] ARTA 551
Cases Citing This Decision
66
Bosanac v Commissioner of Taxation
[2019] HCA 41
Bootlis and Commissioner of Taxation (Taxation)
[2024] AATA 2723
GNBF and Commissioner of Taxation (Taxation)
[2024] AATA 2152
Cases Cited
44
Statutory Material Cited
8
Grofam Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation
[1997] FCA 660
Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Stone
[2005] HCA 21
Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Stone
[2005] HCA 21