Boreham and Dawkins (No 3)

The case of *Boreham and Dawkins (No 3)* concerned an application by the father and a response by the mother, heard by Cronin J in the Family Court of Australia. The precise nature of the dispute is not detailed in the provided text, but it involved an application and a response filed by the respective parents.

The central legal issue before the court was to determine the applications made by the father and the mother. The court was required to consider the merits of each party's submissions and make a determination on the matters brought before it.

Cronin J dismissed both the father's application and the mother's response. The court ordered that the applicant (the father) pay the respondent's (the mother's) costs on an indemnity basis, with the sum to be agreed or assessed. Furthermore, the court certified that it was reasonable to engage counsel to attend the proceedings, pursuant to Order 19.50 of the *Family Law Rules 2004*.