| [2022] FWCA 4303 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Boral Transport Limited
(AG2022/4987)
Boral NSW and ACT Country Tipper Driver’s Enterprise Agreement 2022
| Cement and concrete products | |
| COMMISSIONER HARPER-GREENWELL | MELBOURNE, 8 DECEMBER 2022 |
Application for approval of the Boral NSW and ACT Country Tipper Drivers Enterprise Agreement 2022
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Boral NSW and ACT Country Tipper Drivers Enterprise Agreement 2022 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Boral Transport Limited. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.
The Transport Workers’ Union of Australia being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
The Agreement was approved on 8 December 2022 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 15 December 2022. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 8 December 2026.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE518465 PR748683>
- AGLC
- Boral Transport Limited [2022] FWCA 4303
- Case
- [2022] FWCA 4303
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues for determination were whether the agreement complied with the procedural fairness requirements of section 230 of the Fair Work Act, and if it met the substantive fairness criteria outlined in section 232 of the Act. Key points of contention included the adequacy of employee representation in the agreement's negotiation, the transparency of the consultation process, and the overall fairness of the terms concerning remuneration, conditions of employment, and dispute resolution mechanisms.
The Fair Work Commission found that the agreement was procedurally sound, with adequate representation and consultation processes observed. It determined that the agreement was substantively fair, as the terms and conditions were reasonable and balanced in the context of the industry. The Commission highlighted the agreement's provisions for pay equity, job security, and the establishment of a fair dispute resolution framework as evidence of its substantive fairness. Consequently, the Commission approved the enterprise agreement under section 233 of the Fair Work Act.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.