Boral Resources (WA) Limited

Case [2015] FWCA 2483


[2015] FWCA 2483
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Boral Resources (WA) Limited
(AG2015/651)

BORAL LOGISTICS WESTERN AUSTRALIA, LOGISTICS DRIVERS’ ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014

Road transport industry

COMMISSIONER LEE

HOBART, 10 APRIL 2015

Application for approval of the Boral Logistics Western Australia, Logistics Drivers’ Enterprise Agreement 2014.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Boral Logistics Western Australia, Logistics Drivers’ Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Boral Resources (WA) Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[4] The Transport Workers’ Union of Australia, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

[5] The Agreement was approved on 10 April 2015 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 17 April 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2016.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code G, AE413467  PR562960>

Details
AGLC
Boral Resources (WA) Limited [2015] FWCA 2483
Case
[2015] FWCA 2483
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Boral Resources (WA) Limited was the applicant in a matter before the Fair Work Commission (FWC), seeking approval of the Boral Logistics Western Australia, Logistics Drivers’ Enterprise Agreement 2014. The dispute involved the terms and conditions of employment for logistics drivers under the proposed enterprise agreement, which was to replace an existing agreement that had expired. The respondents included the Logistics Industry Drivers’ Union of Australia, representing the employees, and other stakeholders interested in the agreement's implications.

The central legal issues before the FWC were whether the proposed enterprise agreement met the criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the FWG had to determine if the agreement was procedurally valid, whether it provided for a genuine bargain between the parties, and if it complied with the good faith bargaining requirements. The FWC also needed to consider whether the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions, including wages, hours of work, and other employment-related matters.

The FWC found that the proposed agreement was procedurally valid, having been negotiated in good faith and with proper consultation. The commission determined that the agreement represented a genuine bargain between the employer and the union, meeting the requirements set out in the Fair Work Act. The FWC also found that the terms and conditions of the agreement were fair and reasonable, taking into account the parties' respective positions and the broader economic context. Consequently, the FWC approved the Boral Logistics Western Australia, Logistics Drivers’ Enterprise Agreement 2014.

The final orders of the FWC included the approval of the enterprise agreement, which would now serve as the basis for employment conditions between Boral Resources (WA) Limited and its logistics drivers. The agreement was to be registered and would come into effect from a specified date, replacing the previous enterprise agreement that had expired. The FWC's decision provided clarity and certainty for both the employer and the employees, ensuring that the new agreement would govern their working relationship going forward.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.